Record Number of Home Buyers Searching Outside Their Own City as Properties Fly Off the Shelf

Posted on June 25th, 2020

After some uncertain months while COVID-19 first emerged, home buying has become hot again. Super-hot.

In fact, homes are being scooped up at the fastest pace in more than two years, per Zillow.

Homes Are Going Pending Fast

  • Homes went pending in a median 22 days during week ending June 13
  • Down 9 days month-to-month and 3 days year-over-year
  • Listings going pending in as few as 5 days in Columbus, Ohio
  • But slowing down in metros like NYC (up to 70 days from 47 last year)

During the second week of June, the typical listing accepted an offer after just 22 days, the best reading since June 2018, when it was a 21-day average.

It was even faster in certain Midwest cities like Columbus, Cincinnati, and Kansas City, where homes went pending in less than a week, in as little as five days on average.

Of course, this could be a temporary trend related to sellers being more reticent about listing their homes, while home buyers continue to exhibit a relatively strong appetite.

We’ll know as more listings hit the market and eliminate some of the recent scarcity. Zillow said new listings were up 14% month-over-month, so that could balance the market somewhat.

Meanwhile, there are still slow housing markets, with New York properties typically spending a staggering 70 days on the market before an offer is accepted, an increase of more than three weeks from the same time last year.

Similar trends have been seen in cities like Miami (55 days) and Atlanta (38 days), also struggling with COVID-19 related closures and disruptions.

Density Has Become a Problem

home buyers moving

  • Record 27% of prospective home buyers looking outside their metro
  • Up from 26% in first quarter of 2020 and 25.2% in Q2 2019
  • Redfin says searching for out-of-town homes could be related to coronavirus
  • Searches for homes in small towns continue to surge on Redfin website

If there were a word to define 2020 at this moment, it would probably be “distance.”

Whether it’s social distancing, six feet apart, tables spaced apart, walking on different sides of the street, one-way grocery aisles, etc.

Now it appears living too close to someone else is also a problem, as evidenced by the uptrend in rural and small town home searches.

Per Redfin, pageviews of property listings in towns with fewer than 50,000 residents increased 87% year-over-year in May.

That was more than triple the 22% year-over-year increase in pageviews seen for properties in cities with more than one million residents.

So it’s pretty clear a lot of prospective home buyers have the same idea about greener and larger pastures.

Specifically, many of them want to leave once-bustling metropolises like Los Angeles, New York, and San Francisco, which had the biggest net outflows (more leaving than coming) in April and May.

As for where everyone is going, the top destinations are:

– New York residents want to move to Atlanta
– San Francisco residents want to move to Sacramento
– Los Angeles residents want to move to San Diego
– Chicago residents want to move to Phoenix
– Boston residents want to move to Portland, Maine

The trend of moving from more expensive cities to cheaper ones isn’t new, but it’s probably more practical now since a lot of people can work remotely without issue.

This is especially true for tech workers, whose companies (Facebook, Twitter and Slack) have embraced the work-from-home movement.

For many, this means moving from expensive urban centers or coastal cities to more spread out, inland metros.

The big question remains whether this is a permanent, lasting sea change, or just a short-term trend that will reverse itself in coming months or years.

If it’s short-lived, it could mean opportunity to buy a home or condo in a once-hot urban center at a discount with less competition. Same goes for properties in vacation locales that have cooled.

Will Hot Housing Market Taper Off Later This Year?

  • There are possible headwinds facing the housing market in fall
  • High and lasting unemployment has yet to be factored in
  • And the end of forbearance programs could lead to a foreclosure surge
  • A COVID-19 second wave is also a major concern

We’re only halfway through 2020 and it has been beyond painful. It’s hard to imagine what’s to come for the rest of the year.

And it won’t be without fireworks, given we’ve got a presidential election in the fall that could be more contentious than usual thanks to increased mail-in voting.

There’s also the nagging issue of unemployment, which both the stock market and housing market have seemed to shrug off so far.

At some point, we’re going to need to face the music, and the same goes for expiring mortgage forbearance programs.

While some homeowners will be able to pick up where they left off in making monthly mortgage payments, others may not be so fortunate.

This could lead to an increase in defaults, foreclosures, and higher REO inventory, which could hurt the seemingly unscathed housing market.

Of course, an ongoing inventory shortage could provide a strong buffer, assuming the pool of eligible home buyers remains.

Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi told CNBC he thinks the housing market will “cool off a bit later this year.”

He added that he doesn’t expect a “sharp downturn,” noting that “there are some very solid underpinnings” giving the housing market strength.

I tend to agree – it’s not 2008 all over again. However, at some point in coming years it might be.

Read more: Should I rent or buy a home?

Source: thetruthaboutmortgage.com

Latest Annual State of Credit Report from Experian: How Do You Stack Up?

Every year, the credit reporting agency Experian puts out a report on credit trends in the United States. The Fourth Annual State of Credit takes a look at trends divided by geography and age, as well as other demographics.

I always find it fascinating to have a look at how I stack up as compared to my peers.

Geographic Trends

First of all, I looked at the report’s map showing the cities with the best and worst credit scores. I found it interesting that almost all of the best credit scores are located in the upper midwest. Minnesota and Wisconsin had most of the cities with the top credit scores, with a some sprinkled in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa.

The 10 cities with the worst scores are all below the Mason-Dixon line, with most of them located in the Southeast, with Riverside, CA and Las Vegas, NV as the two in the Southwest.

None of the cities with the worst or best credit scores are located in Utah, my home state.

state-of-credit

state-of-credit

Generational Data

The Experian report divides the generational data into four categories: Greatest Generation (66 +), Baby Boomer (47 – 65), Generation X (30 – 46), and Millennial (19 – 29). I’m firmly in Generation X for the purposes of this report.

According to the report, the Millennials need the most help figuring out how to build their credit. This isn’t exactly surprising. After all, few schools teach financial literacy, and lessons many kids get about credit from their parents often consist of this advice: “Don’t get credit!”

This doesn’t prepare young adults to head out into the world and begin building their credit in meaningful ways. Instead of trying to scare kids about credit, I think it makes more sense to teach them about responsible credit use in combination with solid financial skills.

You have a great chance when you’re in your early 20s to create a solid credit profile, and learning how to do that effectively can mean a better financial result down the road.

National Averages

No report of this nature would be complete without national averages. According to the Experian report, the average debt in the United States is $27,887. The good news is that debt isn’t mostly credit cards. Indeed, the average balance on bank cards is $4,501. I remember a few years ago when the average was higher than that, so it’s clear that progress has been made in terms of the average person paying down debt.

The average number of bank cards that consumers have in the United States is 2.19. This is one area in which I am above average. My husband and I have six credit cards between us. This probably isn’t the most efficient use of our credit, though. I need to re-evaluate the cards and their rewards programs and make sure that I’m sticking with some sort of plan. I tend to get lazy and drift off the program if I’m not careful. We pay off what we spend, but I don’t always use the card to give maximum results if I’m not paying attention.

Take a look at the data, and figure out how you stack up. Are you average for your location and generation? Where do you fit with the national average? Answering these questions can help you figure out whether or not you need to make changes.

Related:

Source: biblemoneymatters.com

Bank of the West Mortgage Review

Reader Interactions

Good Financial Cents, and author of the personal finance book Soldier of Finance. Jeff is an Iraqi combat veteran and served 9 years in the Army National Guard. His work is regularly featured in Forbes, Business Insider, Inc.com and Entrepreneur.