This ApartmentGuide article shines a spotlight on life in the Cornhusker State, where the dynamic urban life of Omaha meets the cultural hub of Lincoln. Renters will find themselves enchanted by the affordable living options along with the state’s beauty. However there are downsides to residing in Nebraska. Whether you’re contemplating a move and want to learn more about the state, here are the pros and cons of living in Nebraska.
Renting in Nebraska snapshot
1. Pro: Rich historical sites
Nebraska is home to numerous historical sites that offer a glimpse into America’s past. From the Chimney Rock National Historic Site to the Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail, the state is a treasure trove for history lovers. These sites not only provide educational experiences but also serve as beautiful locations for outdoor activities.
2. Con: Extreme weather conditions
Nebraska witnesses a diverse spectrum of weather throughout the year, with summers averaging 87 degrees Fahrenheit and winters dropping to lows of 14 degrees Fahrenheit. The state is also situated in Tornado Alley, making it susceptible to severe weather events including tornadoes and thunderstorms. This can pose challenges for residents, from property damage to disruptions in daily life.
3. Pro: Agricultural community
The state’s economy is heavily influenced by its agricultural sector, with Nebraska being a leading producer of beef, pork, corn, and soybeans. This vibrant agricultural community not only supports the local economy but also offers farm-to-table dining experiences across the state, showcasing the freshness and quality of local produce.
4. Con: Limited public transportation options
Nebraska’s public transportation options are relatively limited, especially in rural areas. This can make it challenging for residents without personal vehicles to navigate the state. In cities like Lincoln, the transit score is 24 making it a car-dependent location.
5. Pro: Affordable cost of living
Compared to many other states, Nebraska offers an affordable cost of living. Housing, groceries, and utilities are generally less expensive here, making it an attractive option for those looking to stretch their dollars further. Omaha, Nebraska’s largest city exudes this affordability where you can expect the median sale price to be $255,000 and a one-bedroom apartment averaging to $1,160. The state’s affordability is a significant advantage for residents, allowing for a comfortable lifestyle without the high costs associated with other regions.
6. Con: Limited entertainment and cultural options
While Nebraska has its charms, it may not match the entertainment and cultural offerings found in larger metropolitan areas. Residents may find the options for nightlife, dining, and cultural events more limited, which could be a drawback for those seeking a vibrant city life. However, the state’s community events and natural attractions like the Sandhills, the Great Plains and the Niobrara River offer their own appeal.
7. Pro: Natural beauty and outdoor activities
Nebraska’s natural landscapes, including the rolling Sandhills, picturesque views along the Missouri River, and vast prairies, offer ample opportunities for outdoor enthusiasts. Whether exploring the rugged terrain of Scotts Bluff National Monument, birdwatching at the Platte River, or fishing in the calm waters of Lake McConaughy, the state’s diverse geography provides endless possibilities for adventure.
8. Con: Economic dependence on agriculture
While agriculture is a cornerstone of Nebraska’s economy, this also means that the state’s economic health is closely tied to the agricultural sector. Fluctuations in commodity prices and agricultural production can have significant impacts on the state’s economy which can affect its residents.
9. Pro: Central location
Nebraska’s central location in the United States, with cities like Omaha and Lincoln situated at the intersection of major interstate highways such as I-80 and I-29, makes it a crucial transportation hub. Additionally, Union Pacific’s headquarters in Omaha and its extensive rail network further enhance the state’s connectivity to national and international markets.
10. Con: Water quality concerns
Water quality concerns pose significant challenges for Nebraska, particularly in areas where agricultural runoff and contamination are prevalent. For instance, nitrate pollution from fertilizers used in farming can seep into groundwater sources, affecting drinking water supplies and posing health risks for residents.
11. Pro: Friendly communities
One of Nebraska’s standout features is its friendly and close-knit communities, where neighbors often know each other by name. For instance, small towns like Minden and Broken Bow exemplify this sense of community, where residents come together for local events and foster strong social bonds.
12. Con: Strong winds
Nebraska’s strong winds can be a significant drawback for residents, especially in rural areas where wind speeds can reach high velocities. These gusty conditions not only make outdoor activities challenging but can also lead to property damage, soil erosion, and safety hazards on the roads.
Methodology : The population data is from the United States Census Bureau, walkable cities are from Walk Score, and rental data is from ApartmentGuide.
Buying a home can be exciting, exhausting and, no matter how smoothly the process may go, one of the most stressful things you can do in life. Not having enough money to adequately finance a purchase makes it all the more daunting. Fortunately, there are first-time homebuyer programs available in every state, making it easier for many people to access the resources they need to buy their new home, and to feel more secure through the whole process.
Keep in mind that first-time homebuyers don’t actually have to be buying their first home. A first-time homebuyer is defined as anyone who hasn’t had an ownership interest in a primary home in the past three years.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) also includes in its list of qualified homebuyers:
• A single parent who has only owned a home with a partner while married
• A displaced homemaker who has only owned a home with a spouse
• Someone who has owned a principal residence not permanently affixed to a permanent foundation
• Someone who has only owned a property that wasn’t in compliance with state, local, or model building codes
Here are the homebuyer programs that qualified first-time buyers have available to them in the Northeast:
Maine
Thinking of buying a home in the land of lobster and lighthouses? You’ll want to learn about the market and assess your financial situation before you start searching for a home mortgage loan. (A guide to the different types of mortgage loans can help.)
The scoop on the Main market: Prices in the Pine Tree State were up 5.7% in February 2024 when compared to the prior year, with homes selling for a median of $360,200, according to Redfin. The three most competitive cities for homebuyers were Standish, South Berwich, and Gray.
💡 Learn about Maine first-time homebuyer programs
New Hampshire
The housing market in the Granite State is hot. From February 2023 to February 2024, home prices rose 12.5% to an average sale price of $447,400, according to Redfin. And 41.8% of the homes sold above their list price. Still, there are good opportunities for the first-time buyer in the state, and there are first-time homebuyer assistance programs to help you reach your homeowning goal.
💡 Learn about New Hampshire first-time homebuyer programs
Vermont
The Green Mountain State is paradise for outdoorsy types with forests, lakes, and mountains. No wonder then that the housing market has heated up: The number of homes sold increased 14.2% between February 2023 and 2024. Prices were up 6.5% as well, according to Redfin.
Homebuyers may need help to afford a home with the median price here hitting $361,300. Fortunately, the state has several programs to offer.
💡 Learn about Vermont first-time homebuyer programs
Massachusetts
Glorious New England scenery, a rich history, and diverse cultural and educational opportunities are just some of the things Massachusetts has to offer residents. It’s no wonder that home prices here outpace the national average, or that they are rising. Prices in Massachusetts were up 9.9% in the year ending February 2024, Redfin reports. The median sale price in the state is now $576,900.
At the same time, the median number of days a home stays on the market has dropped by 5 year-over-year, an indicator that the market is warming. Still, there are plenty of opportunities for the first-time homebuyer in Massachusetts.
💡 Learn about Massachusetts first-time homebuyer programs
Rhode Island
This small state is big on charm: Rhode Island’s miles of coastline offer beautiful beaches and picturesque inlets, and you’ll also find dynamic cities and rural small towns here. There’s a lot for the first-time homebuyer in Rhode Island to get excited about. But prices here are well above the national average of $342,941. The average property value is $438,711, up 8.3% year over year, according to Zillow. Wondering what a down payment would look like on a given property price? Use a mortgage down payment calculator to do the math.
💡 Learn about Rhode Island first-time homebuyer programs
Connecticut
You’re looking at a competitive market in the Constitution State: In February 2024, home prices in Connecticut were up 13.2% year-over-year. The median price of a Nutmeg State home is $375,300, according to Redfin, and the number of days a property stays on the market is declining. Fortunately you can still find affordable homes in Torrington and New Britain, among other affordable places in Connecticut.
💡 Learn about Connecticut first-time homebuyer programs
New York
The housing market in New York state can be challenging, especially for first-time buyers. Home prices in the Empire State in January 2024 were up 6.3% over the prior year, with a median sale price of $518,800. The number of days on the market dropped as well. A stunning 37% of homes sold above their listing price.
💡 Learn about New York first-time homebuyer programs
New Jersey
The Garden State saw record real estate sales in some areas in recent years as city dwellers fled to the suburbs. In the year ending February 2024, home prices in New Jersey were up 14.5% over the prior year, and the median sales price was $479,100. The median days on the market dropped 15 year-over-year to 46. Buyers in New Jersey need to prepare themselves to compete in this market.
💡 Learn about New Jersey first-time homebuyer programs
Pennsylvania
Thinking of buying a home in Pennsylvania? Prices rose 6.6% from January 2023 to January 2024, to a median of $264,700, Redfin reported. It’s a seller’s market here, so you may have to compete to get the home you want, especially in cities like New Castle (home prices were up more than 31% in a year) and Mechanicsburg (up 55.5%). Harrisburg and Lancaster ranked as some of the best affordable places to live in Pennsylvania.
💡 Learn about Pennsylvania first-time homebuyer programs
The Takeaway
Qualifying first-time homebuyers have many options available to them in the Northeast, including down payment assistance. If you’re looking to buy your first home and aren’t sure how to get started, researching homebuyer programs is a great place to start. Once you know what kind of assistance you may qualify for, it’s a good idea to estimate just how much house you can really afford using a home affordability calculator.
Looking for an affordable option for a home mortgage loan? SoFi can help: We offer low down payments (as little as 3% – 5%*) with our competitive and flexible home mortgage loans. Plus, applying is extra convenient: It’s online, with access to one-on-one help.
SoFi Mortgages: simple, smart, and so affordable.
*SoFi requires Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) for conforming home loans with a loan-to-value (LTV) ratio greater than 80%. As little as 3% down payments are for qualifying first-time homebuyers only. 5% minimum applies to other borrowers. Other loan types may require different fees or insurance (e.g., VA funding fee, FHA Mortgage Insurance Premiums, etc.). Loan requirements may vary depending on your down payment amount, and minimum down payment varies by loan type.
SoFi Loan Products SoFi loans are originated by SoFi Bank, N.A., NMLS #696891 (Member FDIC). For additional product-specific legal and licensing information, see SoFi.com/legal. Equal Housing Lender.
SoFi Mortgages Terms, conditions, and state restrictions apply. Not all products are available in all states. See SoFi.com/eligibility for more information.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
Third-Party Brand Mentions: No brands, products, or companies mentioned are affiliated with SoFi, nor do they endorse or sponsor this article. Third-party trademarks referenced herein are property of their respective owners.
External Websites: The information and analysis provided through hyperlinks to third-party websites, while believed to be accurate, cannot be guaranteed by SoFi. Links are provided for informational purposes and should not be viewed as an endorsement.
You stop by your local supermarket on Sunday. It’s more crowded than usual, which makes finding a parking spot a little tough. You usually pick up a favorite brand’s organic, free-range chicken breasts, but you haven’t seen them stocked in a while. Instead, all that’s available are factory-farm brands — and they seem more expensive than they should be.
And those dog biscuits from the mom-and-pop bakery across town? They’re usually here, but you can’t find them, either. You’d ask an associate for help finding them, but you don’t see any employees who aren’t busy at the registers or behind the counter.
A version of this lackluster shopping experience is what antitrust experts fear everyday shoppers may encounter if The Kroger Company’s $24.6 billion acquisition of Albertsons Companies Inc. — which would be the largest grocery merger in the nation’s history — is permitted to close. On Feb. 26, the Federal Trade Commission filed a motion to block the acquisition, which was announced in 2022. Attorneys general from eight states and Washington, D.C., joined the FTC in its suit, and the attorneys general in two other states — Colorado and Washington — filed suits of their own against the move to combine the companies.
Several antitrust experts, including academics, public policy researchers and financial analysts, told NerdWallet that a merged Kroger and Albertsons could lead to less product variety, lower product quality, higher grocery prices and an overall worse shopping experience, with stores having fewer employees available for customer service. For workers, many of whom are part of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW), the proposed acquisition may threaten the competitive benefits and retirement packages that the union secured, UFCW representatives told NerdWallet.
One crux of the FTC’s case against the deal is the idea that a combined Kroger-Albertsons would create a monopoly in the supermarket sector, which it considers distinct from other kinds of food retail sectors, such as club stores (Sam’s Club, Costco), premium and organic stores (Whole Foods, Sprouts), superstores (Target, Walmart), dollar stores and e-commerce sellers.
“The FTC is saying that, among and within the entire constellation of companies that sell groceries at retail, there are niches within that larger constellation that matter, and one of them consists entirely of traditional grocery stores,” says James B. Speta, a professor of law at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law. “The company is going to argue, ‘Oh, no, you’ve got to include all these others.’ When you do, composition in that larger market is less significant.”
And that is exactly what proponents of the acquisition say: that the real competition in retail grocery comes from Walmart and other non-traditional outlets.
Scott Moses, partner and head of the grocery, pharmacy and restaurants investment banking practice at Solomon Partners, a financial advisory firm, is representing Albertsons in the deal. Moses says it doesn’t make sense to consider the supermarket sector as distinct from the broader food retail market, which now includes companies like Walmart, Amazon, Costco, Target and several others. All of these companies have invested heavily in their grocery retail businesses over the past decade, competing with supermarkets and fundamentally altering the American grocery landscape.
Walmart owns a 30% market share of broader food retail, based on February 2024 earnings reports, Moses said, and traditional supermarket grocers make up 36% of the food retailers market when supercenters, dollar chains, specialty grocers and online sellers are included. The deal is essential for Kroger and Albertsons to survive the existential threat posed by those retailers, he says.
“The amount of capital that these folks are spending to drive their subscribed members and retain customers is radically more than any supermarket can remotely fathom competing with,” Moses says. “They simply cannot do it.”
Proponents and opponents of the acquisition slice the retail food market differently and tend to cite numbers that bolster their case. According to data from Food & Water Watch, a nongovernmental organization focused on corporate accountability, a combined Kroger and Albertsons would, alongside Walmart, control 55% of the food retail market, excluding convenience stores.
Based on a broader definition of food retailers that Kroger and Albertsons prefer, the new combined company would be the second-largest food retailer in the U.S., with an 11.8% market share, second to Walmart’s 17.1% share, based on widely reported rankings from the research firm GlobalData.
Less ‘urgency’ to innovate for customers, skeptics say
Kroger and Albertsons collectively own and operate nearly 5,000 stores in 48 states. Combined, they employ nearly 700,000 workers. The companies own more than 40 standalone grocery brands, including Safeway, Fred Meyer, Jewel-Osco, Ralphs, Dillons, Tom Thumb and Vons. Their brands are in all regions of the continental U.S. but are concentrated in the West, Midwest and New England. You’ve almost certainly visited one of their stores, and there’s a solid chance that a supermarket owned by either Kroger or Albertsons is your regular grocery store of choice.
Because Kroger and Albertsons are currently competitors, they’re naturally motivated to experiment with product offerings, promotions and prices, says William E. Kovacic, director of the Competition Law Center at George Washington University. These experiments can include stocking well-liked, locally made products that cost more to buy from suppliers than mass-produced alternatives, running sales during peak shopping seasons, or offering ready-to-eat meals and hot bar options.
“The FTC argues that the transaction will reduce the urgency that companies feel to do those kinds of things,” Kovacic says.
From the companies’ perspective, there’s no shortage of urgency to continue innovating and investing in product variety and promotions, Moses says, due to increased competition from Walmart, Costco and other non-supermarket food retailers. He says he first noticed similarities around 15 years ago between competition in the grocery space and the kinds of disruptions that eventually leveled the department store space, which led to hundreds of store closures, bankruptcies and job losses. Those department store disruptions came from some of the same retailing giants currently competing in the grocery space, like Amazon, Walmart and Target.
The continued existence of supermarkets is not guaranteed, Moses says. “If supermarket grocers aren’t allowed to level the playing field, it will not be long before grocery looks like department stores, with thousands of supermarkets closed and millions of union jobs lost.”
Conversely, antitrust experts worry that under a combined Kroger-Albertsons company, consumers would wind up paying the same or higher prices for food products of equal or lower quality. Eleanor Fox, an antitrust expert and professor at New York University School of Law, pointed to the $26 billion merger of Sprint and T-Mobile in 2020 as an illustration of how two companies that already command significant market share — just as Kroger and Albertsons do in the supermarket sector — can often behave after a merger.
In 2023, a federal judge in Chicago ruled that the merger led consumers to “pay higher prices” via “taxes and fees that were previously included in the plan prices, paying new fees and surcharges, or paying more for device protection plans or accessories.”
Of course, telecommunications and grocery are two starkly different industries. Still, Fox says the case is an example of how companies will often raise prices when facing less competition, simply because they can.
“When the competitor goes away, they can manipulate, they can do various things, they can decrease quality, they can decrease service,” Fox says. “They can simply not lower prices when their costs go down.”
Kroger, for its part, has publicly committed to lowering prices following the acquisition.
Workers fear losing hard-fought union benefits
Workers advocates are concerned about the potential acquisition’s impacts and fear workers may lose significant retirement packages, benefits and work shifts if Kroger and Albertsons combine.
Kroger and Albertsons are the two largest employers of unionized grocery workers in the U.S., and the majority of their employees are represented by the UFCW. That’s a powerful negotiating tool for the union, specifically when one company is more open to an agreement or proposal than the other company, says John Marshall, capital strategies director for UFCW Local 300, which represents members across Washington state, northeast Oregon, and northern Idaho.
“Currently, we can go to Albertsons, get a tentative agreement on that particular proposal, and then go to Kroger and say, ‘Look, this is what Albertsons has agreed to. If you don’t also agree to this, we may end up going on strike at the Kroger stores,’” Marshall says. “Yeah, Kroger understands that’s a very effective tool.”
If Kroger’s acquisition goes through, Marshall says the union’s negotiating power would be weakened, and benefits once guaranteed by the union — like its competitive pension plan — may be in flux, Marshall says.
Moses disagrees.
“Stronger company unions get better wages and benefits for their members than weaker company unions, because the weaker company unions can’t afford better benefits,” Moses says. “Teammates will actually be better off.”
Most union members receive a defined benefit pension plan, says Bertha Rodríguez, a representative of UFCW 770, which represents workers in California. Under that plan, a union employee can expect retirement payouts comparable to their Social Security benefits, Marshall says, and the pension pays employees for life.
Defined benefit plans are almost always better for employees than defined contribution plans, as individuals can outlive the funds available in a 401(k) retirement account. Plus, having a defined benefit plan makes it easier to plan for retirement, because workers know exactly what their retirement savings will be worth when they retire. Also, defined benefit plans are guaranteed to pay the worker for as long as they live, unlike defined contribution plans, which can run out.
“The retirement and health care that our union has negotiated are generally far superior to nonunion benefits,” Marshall says.
Because individuals can withdraw from their 401(k) accounts before retirement, many employees wind up doing just that to cover unexpected emergency costs, such as car repairs or hospital bills, Marshall says. But most pension plans won’t allow employees to withdraw until they reach retirement age. This makes pensions a safer bet for grocery workers’ retirement savings, Marshall says. Many of those workers earn hourly wages and may therefore be more vulnerable when facing an emergency expense and have few options aside from pulling money from their retirement savings.
It’s worth noting that the FTC’s prioritization of workers’ rights is a unique hallmark of the Biden administration’s focus on worker protections, Kovacic says. In past antitrust complaints, worker protections typically aren’t cited as prominently as they are in the FTC’s allegations against Kroger and Albertsons.
“An unmistakable theme of the Biden administration’s antitrust program has been to give greater emphasis to the effect that business behavior has on worker welfare,” Kovacic says.
It also reflects the recent growth of unions in the private sector. In 2023, the unionization level in the private sector rose from 6.8% to 6.9% — an increase of more than 261,000 unionized workers, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
Fear of store closures in small towns, despite assurances
Although Kroger has explicitly stated that there will be no store closures as a result of the acquisition, both workers and antitrust experts are concerned about the possibility of closures in smaller cities and towns with fewer grocery retailers.
“Kroger and Albertsons are two of the largest supermarket chains in thousands of local communities throughout the country,” the FTC states in its suit against the deal. “In hundreds of those communities, the proposed acquisition would create a single supermarket with market shares so high as to be presumptively unlawful under the antitrust laws.”
In Gunnison, Colorado, a city south of Boulder with a population of less than 7,000, there are three traditional supermarkets: a Safeway, which is owned by Albertsons; a Kroger supermarket and a City Market, which Kroger owns. (There’s also a Walmart.) If the deal were to close, residents would have to drive 65 miles to a supermarket that’s not owned by Kroger.
“Combined, Kroger, Albertsons — were this merger to go through — and Walmart would control 55% of the food retail market,” says Karen Gardner, a senior policy associate at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a food-focused consumer advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. “That means that there’s two CEOs who would be in control of the majority of food sold in America, and that doesn’t seem like a good idea to me.”
When asked about potential store closures, Moses rejected the notion that it would ever make financial sense for a combined Kroger-Albertsons to close any supermarkets.
“I don’t know how much more explicit they can be,” Moses says, referring to Kroger’s assurances that no stores would close due to the acquisition. “What you need, frankly, is to be larger, so you have more of an ability to invest more in lower prices, more in better stores, more in better wages, more in marketing, so that you can retain more customers.”
A hearing to evaluate the FTC’s block is scheduled for Aug. 26 in the U.S. District Court in Oregon. In January, before the FTC filed its suit, The Kroger Company issued a statement saying its acquisition of Albertsons would likely close before the end of the company’s second fiscal quarter on Aug. 17.
Renting in Chicago? Discover the 10 most affordable Chicago suburbs to rent in 2024.
The Windy City, with its diverse neighborhoods and ever-evolving skyline, has much to offer its residents. But living in Chicago often comes with a high price tag, and you may be wondering how much rent costs in Chicago. The average rent is $1,572 a month for a studio, $1,907 a month for a one-bedroom unit and $2,558 for a two-bedroom unit. However, these prices may not fit your budget.
If you’re seeking a more affordable alternative to Chicago while remaining close enough to enjoy Chicago’s hustle and bustle, you’re in the right place. This article will explore 10 of the most affordable Chicago suburbs. From tranquil small towns to lively communities, you just might find your next hometown below.
Average rent for a studio: $1,450
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $950
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,400
Distance from Chicago: 17 miles
Apartments for rent in Oak Lawn
Our most affordable Chicago suburb is Oak Lawn. Only about 17 miles southwest of Chicago, you’re just a short distance from the city center. The average rent for a one-bedroom apartment is nearly half the cost compared to Chicago, so living in Oak Lawn can save you a lot.
In Oak Lawn, you can explore one of the parks like Oak Lawn Park District and Wolfe Wildlife Park. Additionally, you can discover a variety of local restaurants and shops in the downtown area, providing a taste of the town’s unique character and charm.
Average rent for a studio: $890
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,005
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,195
Distance from Chicago: 45 miles
Apartments for rent in Joliet
About 45 miles southwest of Chicago is our top pick of affordable Chicago suburbs, Joliet. The area is home to about 150,400 residents, and the average rents are much less than in Chicago. For example, a one-bedroom unit in Joliet costs $1,005 compared to $1,907 in Chicago.
If you move to Joliet, you’ll find a lot of fascinating places to explore. For example, you can visit the Old Joliet Prison, which offers guided tours and a glimpse into its rich history. You can also see a show at the Rialto Square Theatre, an elegant and historic venue that hosts a variety of live performances, from rock concerts to Broadway shows.
Average rent for a studio: $922
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,162
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $2,142
Distance from Chicago: 10 miles
Apartments for rent in Oak Park
Another great suburb for renters is Oak Park, roughly 10 miles west of Chicago. The rental prices are great as the average rent for a one-bedroom unit is about $750 a month less than in Chicago.
In Oak Park, you can immerse yourself in the town’s architectural history by taking a guided tour of the Frank Lloyd Wright Home and Studio, highlighting the undeniable style of this renowned architect. You can also visit the Ernest Hemingway Birthplace Museum, showcasing the author’s life and works. Additionally, Oak Park is home to the beautiful and expansive Oak Park Conservatory, a serene environment amidst lush botanical gardens.
Average rent for a studio: $2,022
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,375
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,450
Distance from Chicago: 15 miles
Apartments for rent in Skokie
Skokie is an affordable option for renters while remaining only 15 miles north of Chicago. With the average rent for a one-bedroom costing about $530 less than in Chicago, Skokie may be the suburb for you.
Skokie is also home to the scenic Emily Oaks Nature Center, providing nature lovers with hiking trails, wildlife observation and environmental education programs. You can also explore Skokie Northshore Sculpture Park, which has massive sculptures along landscaped paths.
Average rent for a studio: $1,260
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,400
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,980
Distance from Chicago: 40 miles
Apartments for rent in Aurora
About 40 miles west of Chicago, you’ll find Aurora, another great suburb to add to your list. Home to 179,200 residents, Aurora is an awesome option for renters looking for a city-like atmosphere with more affordable rental prices.
Aurora is home to the beautiful Oakhurst Forest Preserve, with hiking trails, birdwatching areas, and a stocked lake. You can also visit the Paramount Theatre, a historic venue showcasing a variety of performances, from Broadway shows to acoustic sets and more.
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,533
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,844
Distance from Chicago: 30 miles
Apartments for rent in Arlington Heights
Securing the sixth spot on our list, Arlington Heights is a familiar Chicago suburb. This area is home to roughly 76,000 residents, making it feel more like a small town.
Arlington Heights has a solid downtown area with a great selection of shops and restaurants, creating a lively and welcoming atmosphere. The town is also home to Lake Arlington, which has miles of trails and picturesque views.
Average rent for a studio: $1,433
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,573
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,900
Distance from from Chicago: 33 miles
Apartments for rent in Schaumburg
Next on our list of renter-friendly Chicago suburbs is Schaumburg. It’s about 33 miles northwest of downtown, meaning it’s a little longer commute into the city. But saving on rent by living in this affordable city may make the additional commute time worth it.
There is plenty to do in Schaumburg, like exploring Spring Valley Nature Center & Heritage Farm, which has trails and a 19th-century farm. Schaumburg is also home to the Woodfield Mall, which has a range of retail stores, dining options and entertainment venues.
Average rent for a studio: $1,836
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,600
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $1,902
Distance from Chicago: 20 miles
Apartments for rent in Des Plaines
If you call Chicago home, you might already know about Des Plaines, one of its most affordable suburbs. The rents in Des Plaines average $1,600 for a one-bedroom unit and $1,902 for a two-bedroom unit, so you’re still saving substantially compared to Chicago.
In this affordable Chicago suburb, you can spend the evening seeing a show at Des Plaines Theatre and explore the charming downtown area. You can also enjoy the scenic beauty of Prairie Lakes Park.
Average rent for a studio: $1,207
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,652
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $2,300
Distance from Chicago: 15 miles
Apartments for rent in Evanston
Moving to Evanston provides a more laid-back lifestyle than Chicago’s city atmosphere. But you’ll find Evanston offers lots of activities for its residents compared to other Chicagoland suburbs.
You can explore the beautiful Northwestern University campus, known for its historic architecture, college-town vibe and live events. The Evanston Art Center, which hosts various art exhibitions and classes, is also a must-visit, providing a creative outlet for art enthusiasts and a taste of the local arts scene. Additionally, you can see the skyline views of the Chicago skyline from The Lakefill, a park along Lake Michigan, making it an easy pick for top affordable Chicago suburbs.
Average rent for a studio: $2,020
Average rent for a one-bedroom: $1,820
Average rent for a two-bedroom: $2,311
Distance from Chicago: 35 miles
Apartments for rent in Naperville
Rounding out our list of affordable Chicago suburbs is Naperville. This suburb has a population of 149,100 and is roughly 35 miles west of Chicago. In Naperville, you can explore the Naperville Riverwalk, a scenic linear park along the DuPage River, perfect for leisurely walks, picnics and enjoying the majesty of the Midwest.
Naperville is also home to the Naper Settlement, a living history museum with historic buildings and interactive exhibits, giving a glimpse into Naperville’s past.
Find your next home in one of these affordable Chicago suburbs
The Chicago suburbs listed above are a testament to the fact that affordability doesn’t have to come with compromise. From quaint streets lined with cozy homes to bustling local businesses and serene parks, these suburbs offer unique opportunities for families, professionals and retirees alike.
The affordability of these suburbs doesn’t just ease the wallet; it enriches lives, fostering tight-knit communities where neighbors become friends, and memories are made. In the suburbs featured above, the spirit of Chicago thrives in a more accessible, affordable package, proving that the heart of a great city isn’t defined by its price, but by its people and the warmth of the community they build.
If you’re looking to leave your apartment and make the move from renter to buyer, make sure to also check out the most affordable Chicago suburbs to buy a home.
Methodology: Affordability is based on whether a suburb’s one and two-bedroom rent was less than Chicago and under 45 miles from downtown Chicago. Average rental data from Chicago rental market trends on October 26, 2023. Population data sourced from the United States Census Bureau.
We’re all aware that there are vast differences in what’s considered normal around the world, and most of us have even noticed that there are differences in normal between families, small towns, different schools, etc. But have you ever found yourself in the midst of your own country or even your family and wondered How is that just normal? Well, we’re with you. Whether it’s something as seemingly inconsequential as a particular gesture, or more dramatic such as customs surrounding celebrations, it’s pretty common to feel like the odd one out a some point. So stick with us; we’re examining some of the things people find normal that we just can’t get used to.
1. Spitting Loogies
One user shared, “Spitting, especially loogies. I literally almost throw up when I see someone doing it.”
Ok, we’re with you on that one. We know everybody has their own preferences and we’re not here to stop you, but spitting really just baffles us.
2. Holding a Bag of Dog Waste
One Redditor user said, “On colder days when my dad walks the dog, he’ll sometimes hold the dog [waste] bag in his hands to warm his hands.”
Another user commented, “This is deeply disturbing.”
Fortunately, it seems only that commenter’s dad thinks this is normal. Frankly, we’ve never heard of anyone else doing this and we don’t plan to make it any more widespread than it already is. That’s just uncomfortable and gross.
3. Writing With Chalk
“Perhaps not gross, but I am repulsed by holding chalk and writing on a chalkboard. The touch, the feel, the sound, everything,” posted by one Redditor.
Another user shared, “We just got new dishes a couple of months back and the bottom is the raw clay feeling. That terrible gritty sandpaper-like texture. I can hardly use the plates without shivering and getting weirded out.”
There are a lot of odd textures out there, and while they don’t bother a lot of people, when they do bother you it’s almost impossible to forget about.
4. Parents Monetizing Kids on YouTube
One user pointed out, “People monetizing their kids on YouTube.”
Another user replied, “This should be a top comment.”
To be fair, that’s definitely a gray area. But we definitely feel a lot of sympathy for those kids, having to grow up in the spotlight, and sometimes in really vulnerable and uncomfortable ways. We’ll say this much for sure: people’s kids should never have to be publicly uncomfortable just to help their parents make a buck. Providing for the family is the job of an adult, and kids aren’t responsible to help with expenses by performing.
5 When Someone Else Washes My Dishes
One user stated, “When someone else ‘washes’ my dishes for me and I drink from a ‘clean’ glass, and it smells of rotting food and I look at my sponge and it’s covered in food because someone thought that smearing food around my dishes with a sponge somehow made them clean you’re all fired I never want to see you again.”
Sanitation is no joke when you’re washing the dishes. Sponges are great, but you’ve got to keep them clean in order to really clean the dishes you’re washing. And if you’re washing dishes in somebody else’s home to show them you care, go the extra mile and make sure you wash the dishes they way that they like them washed.
6. Wearing Big Engagement Rings Without Cleaning Them
“Wearing those big-a- engagement rings and never properly cleaning them. Especially in a hospital, nobody should be wearing anything below the elbow for good hand hygiene. I can’t imagine how many germs live between all those diamonds that are now spreading to my patients. Just take it all off, leave them at home!” one online user stated.
Another user confirmed and replied, “Omg, so many patients just leave their rings on for years, and then the stones are filled with lotion, dead skin, and grease.”
Besides the important sanitary concerns, did you know your ring will sparkle so much more if you clean it regularly? Most jewelers will offer free cleanings for any rings or jewelry you’ve purchased through them, and otherwise the price is very low, often as cheap as five dollars to get your whole ring polished and looking good as new again.
7 the Sound of Chewing
One user posted, “The sound of people chewing,”
Another user responded, “Ugh, eating with mouth open …”
Honestly, that’s just good manners. There’s definitely an etiquette to chewing. If you’re alone in the privacy of your own home, then be considerate of anyone else around you while you’re eating.
8. Children With Snotty Faces
“Children with food on their face. And snot,” one user shared.
Another user stated, “As a parent, we find it gross too. We’re just tired of cleaning it 900 times a day.”
9. When Clothes Smell Musty
One Redditor posted, “Maybe not ‘normal’ but I am repulsed by the smell created by clothing not correctly drying. The scent is on clothing that sat in the washer machine too long. Or dish towels and bathroom towels that dried without being spread out. I smell it on people from down the aisle in stores. And don’t get me started on drying my hands in someone’s bathroom and finding out the smell is lingering on my hands now.”
Granted, some people have this harder for others. For example, the southwest United States is much less humid than other parts of the country, and that makes drying clothes and towels much faster and easier. In other locations, it’s more challenging to get clothes and linens completely dry and it takes some effort not to smell musty.
10. Constantly Spitting
One user said, “Spitting. I feel physically ill when I witness someone hawking and spitting in public or see spit sitting on the pavement.”
Another user added, “My friend is always doing this. I’m less disgusted than I am confused. I’ve never felt the need to spit spontaneously, lol.”
While we’re here, could somebody tell us why they spit all the time? Is there a good reason for this? From the outside it seems like a pretty unnecessary habit, so please enlighten us.
11. Licking Fingers to Turn a Page
“Licking their fingers to turn a page. Turns my stomach!” one Redditor shared.
Another user added, “Or counting money. F- filthy.”
Ok, fair enough.. If you need to lick your fingers for any reason, please wash your hands afterwards. Keep the germs from spreading and be considerate of others.
12. Not Washing Hands Before a Meal
One Commenter mentioned, “Not washing hands before a meal. You have been in filth, and you are going to touch your food with those hands? Yuk.”
Another replied, “Also, not washing your hands when cooking food. I can’t understand how people just start cooking food for other people without doing it.”
13. Not Rinsing the Soap Suds off Dishes
One user added, “Washing dishes in a tub of soapy water and not rinsing off the soap suds. Or not scrubbing the outsides of pots and pans as well. Makes me want to vomit. I’d rather not taste stale soap and bacteria in my cup of tea or food, thanks. I can always tell as well.“
Soap always leaves a residue, and yea, most of us can taste it. It’s such a strong flavor and it adds an unpleasant taste to anything you eat or drink from that dish. It seems Washing dishes is more of an art than maybe we first thought.
14. Coughing Without Covering
“Spitting, coughing without covering your mouth. I have multiple sclerosis. Get sick really easily,” one user added.
Another user agreed, “I work in a hospital. I still wear a mask the entire work day. I’ve been asked “why” over & over, told that I don’t have to do that anymore, so-called a sheep, & various other comments. My job is directly in patient’s bubbles. The mask does prevent being a direct hit from bodily fluids, helps with the unpleasant outdoors, & hides my facial expressions from exposure to those things.”
Ok, that’s a pretty fair assessment. If you’re working with people’s bodies and fluids, it only makes sense to be as protected as you can.
15. Not Washing Your Hands After Going to the Bathroom
A user commented, “Not washing your hands after going to the bathroom. Nasty.”
Another user shared, “I would hope everyone finds this nasty …”
What can we say; there’s a reason stores and restaurants have signs reminding employees to wash their hands. It’s both less common than we could wish, and much more gross than some people seem to think.
16. Employers Paying New Hires More Than Current Employees
One user stated, “Employers paying new hires more than tenured employees. Having drastically different pay rates for people with similar credentials doing the same job.”
Another user added, “Not entirely the same, but my first job was at a McDonald’s. I was making, I think, like, 5.45 an hour? One of my friends at the time got hired on at 6/hr. I approached the manager about it, and he said, ‘It was a mistake, but I can’t increase your pay or decrease theirs. Also, who told you about it?’ He made clear in his tone he intended to punish the person that told me, and I didn’t say s-.”
17 Wearing Sneakers Without Socks
“Wearing sneakers without socks. Ugh! The sweat stinks,” one user shared.
Another user replied, “Agreed. But Most of the time you see that; they’re probably just wearing no-shows.”
We agree with both commenters; most of the time people are wearing no-show socks. And if they’re not wearing socks at all, that’s about to smell terrible. Even shoes you’ve only worn with socks tend to smell terrible after a while. But if you really have make that fashion choice, rest assured there are plenty of stinky-shoe remedies online to rescue you.
18. Childbirth
One Redditor stated, “Childbirth. We’re all here because of it, and it’s currently my day job to catch a baby or two per day, but [holy cow] is it like watching a woman’s [body] go through Vietnam each time.”
One user added, “Time for a game of ‘child-snatcher or midwife?’”
It’s true that watching childbirth can be an uncomfortable process, but birth is truly a normal part of life. Like the commenter said, without birth none of us would be here, so we have our mothers to thank for going through all that struggle for us.
19. Kissing Pets on the Mouth
“Kissing pets in their mouth,” shared one user.
Another user posted, “What everyone’s dad didn’t say, ‘I just saw that dog eating s- outside,’ every time this happens … “
No offense to the pet parents out there, but there’s definitely a lot of germs not only in cats’ and dogs’ mouths, but in human mouths. And transferring that many germs between humans and animals has never been a great idea. We get that it’s normal and a lot of people connect with their pets and show affection that way, but maybe consider some other manner of pet cuddling than kissing them.
20. Smacking Gum
Another commenter shared, “Smacking gum. I hate it. And loud chewing/swallowing noises.”
Chewing gum seems to be one of those things people either love or hate; there’s no middle ground. But we totally understand how it can be annoying for those who are highly sensitive, especially to noise.
What do you think of the list shared above? Share your thoughts with us down in the comments!
Source: Reddit.
10 Actors Perfectly Cast for Their Character Roles
Have you ever watched a movie or show and been completely lost in it because of how well an actor or actress became their character? Check out this article for a whole list of actors who were perfectly cast!
11 Vampire Movies That Will Make You Thirst for More
You know that feeling where you’re on a movie kick in a certain genre, but you seem to run out of good movies to watch? Well, if you’re down for a vampire movie or three, check out this article for the best ones out there!
10 Incredible Movies That People Rated 10 Out of 10
It’s pretty hard to replicate the experience of watching your favorite movie for the first time, but we’ve put together a list of movies that people have rated at a perfect 10/10. Next time you need a good movie to watch, check this out!
10 Famous People Who Canceled Themselves With Their Own Stupidity
We’ve all been there: you make a comment you haven’t thought through at all, and the whole room goes silent at what you’ve just said. But can you imagine doing that as a famous person—and getting canceled? Check out this list of celebrities who did just that!
13 Things You Shouldn’t Do When You’re in the US
Are you planning a trip to the US? Culture varies a lot between countries, even countries that share borders. So if you’re headed to the good old U. S. of A, here are a few pointers to make your travels go more smoothly!
From the tranquil shores of Spring Lake to the historic streets of Bogota, there are dozens of picturesque towns throughout New Jersey. With a rich history, vibrant communities, and a slower pace of life, these small towns provide a great escape from the hustle and bustle of city living. Join us as we explore the hidden gems and untapped beauty of these charming small towns in New Jersey.
#1: Villas, NJ
Median Sale Price: $734,250
Homes for Sale in Villas | Apartments for Rent in Villas
Villas is a small town known for its picturesque landscapes and tranquil atmosphere. With a median sale price of $734,250, this town offers a variety of beautiful homes for those seeking a peaceful retreat away from the busy city. Residents and visitors can enjoy outdoor activities such as hiking, biking, and fishing, as well as explore the local shops and restaurants that add to the town’s charm.
#2: Leonia, NJ
Median Sale Price: $619,000
Homes for Sale in Leonia | Apartments for Rent in Leonia
Leonia is a delightful small town in New Jersey known for its rich history and vibrant community. Residents can enjoy exploring the town’s historic sites, participating in community events, and dining at the local eateries that showcase the town’s diverse culinary scene.
#3: Haledon, NJ
Median Sale Price: $615,000
Homes for Sale in Haledon | Apartments for Rent in Haledon
Haledon is a hidden gem of a small town, offering a close-knit community and a peaceful atmosphere. Residents can enjoy exploring the town’s parks, visiting local art galleries, and experiencing the warm hospitality of the local businesses.
#4: Bogota, NJ
Median Sale Price: $598,000
Homes for Sale in Bogota | Apartments for Rent in Bogota
Bogota is a charming small town known for its friendly community and convenient location. The town has plenty of parks and recreational facilities, as well as local shops and restaurants that contribute to the town’s vibrant atmosphere.
#5: Brookdale, NJ
Median Sale Price: $340,000
Homes for Sale in Brookdale | Apartments for Rent in Brookdale
Brookdale is a quaint town nestled in a picturesque setting. With a median sale price of $340,000, this town offers affordable housing options. Residents can enjoy the town’s natural beauty, explore the nearby hiking trails, and experience the peaceful ambiance that makes Brookdale a desirable place to call home.
#6: Glen Ridge, NJ
Median Sale Price: $685,500
Homes for Sale in Glen Ridge | Apartments for Rent in Glen Ridge
Known for its tree-lined streets and historic architecture, Glen Ridge is another great small town in New Jersey. Residents can enjoy the town’s parks, visit the local museums, and dine at the cozy restaurants that add to the town’s unique character.
#7: Mystic Island, NJ
Median Sale Price: $452,000
Homes for Sale in Mystic Island | Apartments for Rent in Mystic Island
Mystic Island is a hidden treasure of a small town, offering a waterfront lifestyle and a close-knit community. With a median sale price of $452,000, this town provides a range of housing options that’s relatively affordable. Life in Mystic Island consists of enjoy boating, fishing, and other water activities, as well as exploring the local shops and restaurants that embrace the town’s coastal charm.
#8: Milltown, NJ
Median Sale Price: $722,500
Homes for Sale in Milltown | Apartments for Rent in Milltown
Milltown is a charming small town known for its rich history and strong sense of community. Residents can enjoy the town’s parks, participate in community events, and explore the local shops and restaurants that contribute to the town’s vibrant atmosphere.
#9: Ashland, NJ
Median Sale Price: $403,000
Homes for Sale in Ashland | Apartments for Rent in Ashland
Ashland boasts plenty of peaceful neighborhoods and a convenient location. With a median sale price of $403,000, this cozy town offers affordable housing options for many homebuyers. Ashland has plenty of greenspaces, shopping centers, and locally-owned restaurants.
#10: Spotswood, NJ
Median Sale Price: $305,000
Homes for Sale in Spotswood | Apartments for Rent in Spotswood
Next up on the list of charming small towns in New Jersey is Spotswood. For those in search of small-town charm, Spotswood boasts gorgeous parks, annual community events, and local shops and restaurants.
#11: Mays Landing, NJ
Median Sale Price: $235,000
Homes for Sale in Mays Landing | Apartments for Rent in Mays Landing
Mays Landing is known for its rural beauty and peaceful surroundings. With a median sale price of $235,000, this town offers affordable housing in a charming, suburban setting. Residents can enjoy the town’s parks, explore the nearby nature reserves, and experience the warm hospitality of the local businesses.
#12: Spring Lake, NJ
Median Sale Price: $825,000
Homes for Sale in Spring Lake | Apartments for Rent in Spring Lake
Last on our list of charming small towns in New Jersey is Spring Lake. Known for its beautiful beaches and upscale atmosphere, this town offers luxurious housing in a cozy setting. Residents can enjoy the town’s pristine beaches, visit the local boutiques and art galleries, and dine at the upscale restaurants that contribute to the town’s elegant charm.
Connecticut, known for its coastal cities and rural areas dotted with small towns, is a state that offers a broad range of living experiences. From bustling urban centers to serene countryside, Connecticut provides various options for renters on a budget. While the state is often associated with wealth and high costs of living, particularly in areas such as Fairfield County and the Greater Hartford area, there are multiple cities in Connecticut where renters can find affordable housing. Based on our analysis, the five cheapest cities for renters are East Hartford, Waterbury, Bridgeport, Willimantic, and Bristol.
East Hartford, CT
Located on the eastern bank of the Connecticut River, East Hartford offers affordable living with a population of 50,036 and a surprisingly high median income of $59,954. A renter can find a 2-bedroom apartment with an asking rent of $1,312, quite affordable considering the city’s median home value of $168,300. East Hartford is home to many parks like Goodwin Park and Wickham Park, and is in close proximity to points of interest such as the Rentschler Field Stadium and the historic Main Street District.
Waterbury, CT
Waterbury, with a population of 107,841, is another affordable city in Connecticut. Despite a lower median income of $46,329, the city’s 2-bedroom asking rent is $1,250, which is quite reasonable. The city, known as “The Brass City” for its rich industrial past, offers a wealth of historic and cultural resources like the Mattatuck Museum and Palace Theater. Waterbury is also near the Naugatuck State Forest, providing ample opportunities for outdoor fun.
Bridgeport, CT
With a population of 145,014, Bridgeport is the largest city in Connecticut and one of the most affordable for renters. The city’s median income is $47,484, close to Waterbury, and the rent for a 2-bedroom apartment stands at $1,200. Filled with historical spots such as the Barnum Museum and beautiful seaside parks like Seaside Park and Pleasure Beach, Bridgeport offers a rich mixture of urban and outdoor delights.
Willimantic, CT
Willimantic is a smaller city of 18,669 residents nestled in Eastern Connecticut. Despite a lower median income of $35,630, the asking rent for a 2-bedroom apartment is $1,460, still within reach for many. Known for landmarks like the Willimantic Footbridge and the Mill Museum, the city carries a charm that’s distinctly New England.
Bristol, CT
Bristol, with a population of 60,039 and a median income of $68,485, offers a 2-bedroom apartment for a reasonable $1,410 rent. Home to the famous ESPN headquarters and the historic New England Carousel Museum, Bristol offers a blend of urban amenities and historic charm. This, coupled with easy access to beautiful parks like Rockwell Park, makes Bristol an affordable and desirable city for renters.
Methodology
The cheapest cities in each state were ranked based on its median home price and median asking rents for studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom units. Prior to ranking, inputs were normalized, and weights were applied using a 1.25:1 ratio of asking rents to home prices. Data on home prices are from the U.S. Census 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Data on asking rents are from Rent. Cities without data for one- or two-bedroom asking rents or a population of less than 10,000 were removed from this ranking. Any other missing values were zeroed and did not impact the final score.
There are many pros and cons to investing in a small town as opposed to a larger town. I have many properties in small towns and larger towns and personally, I think the small towns are overlooked based on the many advantages they have. Some of the major differences in small towns are the taxes, demand, building permits, and more.
Pros of investing in real estate in a small town:
There are many advantages to investing in smaller towns. I have found some great deals in them and there were many advantages I did not think of until I had bought and operated a property in those small towns.
Lower property prices: Property prices in small towns are typically lower than in urban areas. This means that you can invest more property for your money. This is because fewer investors are looking at small towns. I have found multifamily and commercial to be much cheaper.
Higher rental yields: Rental yields in small towns are often higher than in urban areas. This means that you can generate more income from your rental properties. This rental yield comes from the fact that rents might be a little lower but prices are even lower relative to those rents producing a higher ROI.
Lower vacancy rates: Vacancy rates in small towns are typically lower than in urban areas. This means that you are more likely to find tenants for your properties. I have found this to be true as well because there are very few rentals, there are often people waiting for anything to pop up.
Stronger appreciation potential: Small towns are often experiencing population growth and economic development. This can lead to stronger appreciation potential for your investment properties. If there is a shortage of homes in the area, you could see huge appreciation if those homes are cheaper than the cost to build.
Lower taxes: In my area in Colorado the small towns often have lower property taxes and lower sales taxes. The property taxes can save thousands of dollars a year on larger properties.
Less regulations: Some small towns are also much easier to build and remodel in. Each town has different building permit processes and requirements. Some towns could be stricter but some could be very easy to work with.
Cons of investing in real estate in a small town:
Limited buyer pool: There is a smaller pool of potential buyers for properties in small towns. This can make it more difficult to sell your properties when you are ready to do so. If the town has a surplus of homes, prices could stay stagnant for many years.
Less access to amenities: Small towns may have fewer amenities than urban areas, such as shopping malls, restaurants, and entertainment options. This can make it more difficult to attract tenants and buyers.
More difficult to manage properties: It can be more difficult to manage properties in small towns, as there may be fewer qualified property managers available.
Less liquidity: Properties in small towns are typically less liquid than properties in urban areas. This means that it may be more difficult to sell your properties quickly if you need to do so.
Local politics: Some small towns may be difficult to work with or treat outsiders differently if you do not live there. This is not always the case but I have been told I can’t do certain things with a property and then had someone buy it from me in that small town and do exactly what I asked to do.
Is it worth investing in a small town?
I have had amazing luck investing in small towns. One of the properties I bought was a 4 plex for less than $200k in 2018. That property would have been at least $300k in the larger town 10 miles away. I have also had great luck with commercial property and single-family flips as well. There are challenges and just because there are advantages to investing in a small town, that does not mean it is easy.
Conclusion
Before you invest in any property, make sure to research the local market and economy. This will help you understand the local roadblocks, rental yields, and surplus or shortages in the area. Talk to the city government, especially the zoning and permit people (they might be one person). Try to see if the population is increasing or decreasing and make sure you have contractors or property managers that will work in the area if you need them!
Delaware may be one of the nation’s smaller states, but it certainly packs a punch in character and opportunity. From its strategic location on the East Coast and tax-friendly policies, to its vibrant communities and natural beauty, there is much to appreciate about life in the First State. However, like any location, living in Delaware has its share of drawbacks. In this Redfin article, we will look at what it’s like to call this state home, exploring the unique pros and cons of living in Delaware. So whether you’re looking for homes for sale in Wilmington, apartments in Dover, or just want to learn more about the area, join us as we embark on a journey through the First State.
Pros of living in Delaware
1. No sales tax and other great tax benefits
One of the standout advantages of living in Delaware is the absence of a state sales tax. This unique feature sets Delaware apart from many other states in the U.S. Residents of the “First State” can enjoy tax-free shopping, making their dollars stretch further and saving significantly on everyday purchases, big-ticket items, and even luxury goods. Additionally, the state does not tax Social Security income, and no inheritance or estate tax exists. These favorable tax policies contribute to a lower overall tax burden for individuals and families, offering an attractive financial incentive for those who appreciate keeping more of their hard-earned income.
2. Proximity to major East Coast cities
Delaware’s prime location on the East Coast offers a significant advantage to its residents. Positioned between the bustling urban centers of New York City and Washington, D.C., Delaware provides quick and convenient access to these metropolitan hubs’ cultural, economic, and professional opportunities. The state’s well-connected transportation infrastructure, including I-95 and Amtrak, makes commuting or weekend getaways a breeze. This geographic advantage allows Delawareans to enjoy the benefits of living in a more relaxed and affordable environment, while still having the vast array of amenities and services of major cities just a short journey away.
3. Beautiful coastal areas
The state boasts a stunning stretch of coastline along the Atlantic Ocean, featuring pristine beaches such as Rehoboth, Bethany, and Dewey Beach, each with a unique character. These coastal havens offer opportunities for sunbathing, swimming, water sports, and scenic walks along the boardwalks. Additionally, Delaware’s coastal areas are home to picturesque fishing villages like Bowers and charming beach towns, each exuding a sense of nostalgia and offering delectable seafood dining options.
4. Historic charm and cultural heritage
As one of the original 13 colonies, the state boasts a rich legacy celebrated through numerous historic sites and museums. Delaware enchants residents with its rich tapestry of history, ranging from the charming colonial-era buildings in New Castle to Dover’s pivotal role in early American history. Its charming historic districts and landmarks provide a living connection to the past, while cultural festivals, arts communities, and educational institutions help foster a dynamic appreciation for heritage.
5. Sense of community
Delaware’s residents often praise the state’s strong sense of community, fostered by numerous small towns and close-knit neighborhoods. Communities frequently unite for local events, festivals, and volunteering, reinforcing neighborly bonds and nurturing a supportive, inclusive atmosphere. The state’s modest size maintains this sense of connection even in larger cities, ensuring a network of support and meaningful relationships. This pervasive sense of belonging significantly enriches residents’ quality of life, adding to Delaware’s charm and making it an inviting place to live.
Cons of living in Delaware
1. High cost of living in certain areas
While Delaware offers diverse, appealing features, including its tax benefits and coastal beauty, it’s not without drawbacks, particularly concerning the cost of living in specific areas. Sussex County, famed for its scenic coastal communities, experiences a cost of living approximately 3% higher than the national average, driven in part by the elevated demand for housing in these picturesque towns. The state’s median sale price, at $341,500, is lower than the national median of $412,001. However, the median sale price in Lewes soars to $596,000, underscoring the considerable discrepancy in real estate costs. This higher cost of living in select areas can pose financial challenges for residents, affecting housing affordability and everyday expenses but there are many affordable places to explore.
2. Limited public transportation options
One notable drawback of living in Delaware is the limited public transportation options, particularly in some less urbanized areas. While the state’s metropolitan regions offer some public transit services, like Dover, which has a transit score of 28, the coverage and frequency of these systems can be limited. This leaves residents in more rural or suburban areas reliant on personal vehicles for commuting and daily transportation. This lack of extensive public transport can lead to increased traffic congestion, higher commuting costs, and limited accessibility for those who do not own a car.
3. Extreme weather fluctuations
Delaware’s weather patterns are characterized by extreme fluctuations, which can be a considerable con for residents. The state experiences all four seasons, but their transitions can be abrupt and unpredictable. Winters can bring heavy snowfall and cold temperatures, while summers can deliver sweltering heat and high humidity. Although often pleasant, the spring and fall seasons can also be marked by sudden weather changes, including severe thunderstorms and even hurricanes in some years. These rapid shifts can challenge planning outdoor activities and dressing for the day.
4. Coastal flooding and hurricane risks
With a significant portion of the state’s population concentrated along the Atlantic coast, Delawareans are more exposed to the potential consequences of coastal flooding and hurricanes. During hurricane season, the state faces the risk of severe storms and rising sea levels, which can lead to flooding, property damage, and displacement of residents. While the state has implemented measures and emergency response plans, including potential evacuation protocols, the recurrent threat of hurricanes can be a cause for concern, impacting both homeowners and the overall quality of life.
5. Smaller job market
The number of job openings and career advancement prospects can be more limited than larger metropolitan areas. The state’s compact size also means that commuters often look beyond Delaware’s borders for job options, adding to the complexity of the employment landscape. Consequently, career growth and industry diversity can be challenging, making it more difficult for professionals in certain fields to find their desired positions within the state.
Pros and cons of living in Delaware: Bottom line
Ultimately, the decision to call Delaware home depends on individual priorities and preferences. For some, the state’s serene coastal beauty and tax benefits may outweigh the disadvantages. For others, the challenges may weigh more heavily. Ultimately, living in Delaware balances the pros and cons to create a unique and fulfilling lifestyle in the “First State.”
Architect Louis Naidorf had a disastrous 80th birthday cake. In 2008, Naidorf, who designed the Capitol Records building in Hollywood, was presented with a celebration cake that had been custom-baked in the shape of his iconic cylindrical building. But the pastry soon reflected the rather substantial difference between concrete and flour.
“When the cake was brought out, it gently collapsed, and everyone applauded,” Naidorf says, laughing over the phone from his home in Santa Rosa. “It was like in one of the movies where the Capitol Records building was destroyed.” Thankfully the cake for his 95th birthday, which he celebrated last month, was more structurally sound.
Designated a historic-cultural monument in 2006, the building has long been a favorite Los Angeles landmark to demolish on film — especially for filmmaker Roland Emmerich, who blew it up with an alien spaceship in “Independence Day” and slammed it with twisters in “The Day After Tomorrow.” Yet no movie can ever write the building out of a central place in popular music history. The tower is synonymous with the illustrious Capitol Records, home of Nat King Coleand Frank Sinatra, and the American record label of Pink Floyd and the Beatles, with the latter’s stars lining the Hollywood Walk of Fame right in front of the building.
Over the last several years, the building has been illuminated in support of various sociopolitical causes. In 2020, it was lighted red to support independent music venues. Last year, during their performance in Hollywood, Duran Duran lighted the Capitol Records building blue and yellow in solidarity with Ukraine. “I think that’s excellent,” Naidorf says. “Anything that vigorously engages the public on the right side of good causes transcends other issues. I’m flattered they use the Capitol Records building. It means it has enough cachet to merit being chosen to do that.”
Like the famous landmark he designed, Louis Naidorf has of late been experiencing his own brush with stardom, with postcards from autograph seekers arriving at his door. He is flattered but doesn’t take the attention too seriously.
Advertisement
“It’s obvious that if someone asks me for four signatures I’m part of trading baseball cards or something,” he says. “They are going to trade four Lou Naidorfs for one Joe Smith.”
Still, he’s surprised and somewhat baffled by the sudden burst of recognition after all these years. “I guess my name ended up on a list or something,” he shrugs.
Naidorf was just 24 years old when he designed the Capitol Records building, in 1953. It was the world’s first circular office building.
Though it was 70 years ago, he vividly recalls how he felt when he received the assignment for his first solo project. “At one level, I felt enormous anxiety that if I didn’t get a solution, very, very quickly, something terrible would happen,” he says. “On the other hand, I felt a total confidence that I could do it. So it was a crazy contradiction.”
Advertisement
Naidorf notes the building’s porcelain enamel sunshades with carefully spaced gaps to play with light and shadow. These cause spiral lines to appear on the building, drawing the eye into a rhythm rather than straight up and down. “You can see Capitol Records from quite a distance and you get a first impression of its basic form and character. You have a reading of it as complete,” he says. “But the building is designed so that the closer you get to the building, you discover more details.”
What about the long-standing myth that its round shape was designed to look like a stack of records with a rooftop antenna resembling a phonograph needle? As hard as it might be to believe, the legendary story about the building is just a coincidence — an urban legend that Naidorf has tried to debunk for decades.
In fact, when his boss, Welton Becket, tasked him with the assignment, the building was simply referred to as Project X. Shrouded in secrecy, Naidorf was given little guidance for the project other than being asked to design a 13-story building on a sloped side street in Hollywood that had to be kept as cool as possible and had smaller than usual floor space. He also didn’t know for whom he was designing it. Naidorf says it was common for clients’ identities to be kept confidential during the initial planning stages of a project.
However, Naidorf relished the creative latitude. The absence of information left him unburdened by preconceived ideas. “I knew the door was open for something special. It urged me so strongly,” he says earnestly. “I felt, and I think all architects feel this way … there’s a drive to translate the mundane bare requirements that clients come in with into something that has some poetic qualities about it.”
Advertisement
Naidorf then had an epiphany: The project’s requirements were “eerily resonant” with a series of circular buildings he had designed for his master’s thesis in college. “The round shape is a very efficient enclosure of space,” he says. “You get more bang for your buck.”
Not everyone agreed with his approach. Naidorf says that Capitol Records co-founder and President Glenn Wallichs became irate when Naidorf presented him with a model and drawings of a round building, and “violently rejected” the design. “He thought it was a cheap stunt designed by a young guy to make the building look like a stack of records,” Naidorf says, laughing.
Wallichs insisted that Naidorf replace the round design with plans for a rectangular building. But when both rectangular and circular designs were presented to the insurance company financing the land, Naidorf says that Wallichs was urged to proceed with the round design.
Soon after, when talk of the building housing a radio station (that never came to fruition) was raised, Naidorf fretted when he was asked to design an antenna. He was worried that it would look like a phonograph needle and cement the idea that the building was designed to look like a stack of records.
Owing to his nagging concern, Naidorf positioned the rooftop spire asymmetrically, poised to appear as if it touches the roof delicately, like “a ballerina en pointe.” He calls it the building’s “grace note.” Still, the stack-of-vinyl myth persists. Laughing, Naidorf says, “It’s the most enduring myth of all.”
Advertisement
Despite his good humor, it leaves him conflicted. “The building was not designed as a cartoon or a giggle. To have it trivialized with the stack-of-records myth is annoying and dismaying,” he says. “There’s not a thing on the building that doesn’t have a solid purpose to it.”
Naidorf’s ingenuity has been especially impressive to Los Angeles-based architect Lorcan O’Herlihy, who says he has “often responded strongly to the fact and admired that here was this interesting architect [Naidorf] who was combining science and art, or artistry and technology. Welton Becket [& Associates], very much to their credit, were at a period where modernism was at its heyday and they had to come up with ideas that were new and fresh and they did it, and Lou was certainly instrumental in that. His work is extraordinary.”
Naidorf was born in Los Angeles in 1928. His father owned a shop where he made and sold women’s clothing, with Naidorf’s mother lining the garments. Owing to his father’s lack of accounting skills and business acumen, however, the business often collapsed, forcing his parents to work at a garment factory until debts could be paid off to reopen the store.
Throughout his childhood, Naidorf’s family struggled financially as they moved around, living mostly in Silver Lake and Los Feliz. With only enough money to rent studio apartments, Naidorf’s parents slept on a Murphy bed while Naidorf spent his nights on a mattress on the floor.
As a little boy, Naidorf felt drawn to buildings. When his third-grade teacher decorated the classroom with a Hawaiian vacation theme, his fascination morphed into a calling. “I asked my teacher who made the drawings and she said, ‘Naval architects.’ And then I asked her who draws the plans for houses and she said, ‘Architects.’ She told me to ask my mother to show me the floor plans that were published in the real estate section of the Sunday edition of the newspaper.
Advertisement
“When I saw them, I was a goner,” he swoons. “I now knew what I wanted to do. I wanted to be an architect.”
Naidorf remembers, at age 8, designing a three-bedroom house, using a card table as a makeshift drafting table. Soon after, he began designing small towns. “It wasn’t anything brilliant, but I was learning to draw, learning to scale and learning to think in spatial terms,” he says. When he was 12 years old, Naidorf got a part-time job at a bookstore, where he spent his first two paychecks on architecture books, absorbing them until they were threadbare.
Beyond literature, Naidorf amassed a growing collection of architectural materials (T-square, rectangles, instruments for ink drawings), thanks to his bar mitzvah presents, and decided he was ready to get to work. Sanford Kent, a young architect who had just graduated from USC, hired a tenacious 13-year-old Naidorf, paying him out of his own pocket.
Naidorf says tackling the abstract problems Kent gave him at once stimulated his mind and were instrumental in forming his long-standing ethos. “It got me thinking about architecture in terms of its effect on human emotions. The key issue is, ‘How do people respond to your work, whether from a distance or by living it?’” he says.
He continued to soak up whatever he could about architecture, gearing his junior and high school classes toward studying architecture in university. He attended UC Berkeley instead of the privately funded USC, not only to leave home and expand his horizons but also because of its affordability.
Advertisement
Even still, Naidorf couldn’t afford all of the program’s required materials. He borrowed airbrushes from his fellow students, who would also give him their pencil stubs instead of tossing them out. Naidorf submitted his assignments on pebble board, which was not only cheaper than illustration board but allowed him to draw on one side, flip it over and draw on the other.
In 1950, Naidorf graduated at the top of his class and got his master of architecture degree a year early. He skipped his graduation ceremony because he had a job interview the next day at Welton Becket & Associates, where he was promptly hired. Among his earliest design assignments: a tray slide for a hospital cafeteria, a clothes closet and a “Please Wait to Be Seated” sign for a restaurant.
Three years into his employment, he began working on the Capitol Records building. Naidorf says he would design it the exact same way if he were given the assignment today.
Andrew Slater, former Capitol Records president and chief executive (2001-07), attests to the building’s distinctive charm. “When you go to work every day in that building it’s like you’re going into a piece of art, and it informs your attitude … to do something with that mindset, which is great,” he says. “Even though working in the music industry is, in a sense, an industrial endeavor, you never felt like you were doing anything industrial when you walked into that building.”
Advertisement
Still, Naidorf fears being perceived as a “Johnny One Note,” as he puts it. Noting the plaque bearing his name outside the building’s main entrance, he expresses gratitude but wariness “that this one modest project has to carry my whole reputation on it.”
It’s a fair point, given the magnitude of Naidorf’s notable oeuvre. It’s earned him 17 regional honor and merit awards and AIA California’s Lifetime Achievement Award (2009). His work also has been featured at the J. Paul Getty Museum in Los Angeles.
“I know Capitol Records is always the first one people talk about and it’s a splendid, iconic building that fuses artistry and functionalism, but he’s also produced other projects over the years,” says fellow architect O’Herlihy. “The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is brilliant.”
Advertisement
Naidorf designed the 3,000-seat capacity Santa Monica Civic Auditorium on the heels of the Capitol Records building, in the late 1950s. Essentially two buildings in one, it was a challenge to design a locale that functioned at once as a performance space with a sloped floor and an exhibit hall with a flat floor for sports events, banquets and trade shows.
He transformed the floor from flat to tilted using a hydraulic system that was hailed for its innovation. “I don’t think you’ll find any place that has a symphony on a Friday night and a gem show, or some kind of hobby show, on Saturday,” he says.
Formerly home to the Santa Monica Symphony Orchestrabut currently sitting vacant, the Civic Auditorium opened its doors to the public in 1958. From 1961 to 1968, it hosted the Academy Awards. It also was the site of live recordings including George Carlin’s comedy record “Class Clown” and the Eagles’ “Eagles Live,” a double LP recorded during their three-night run at the venue. It also hosted “The T.A.M.I. Show” in 1964.
In the meantime, while the Civic was still under construction, Naidorf designed the 15,000-seat capacity Los Angeles Memorial Sports Arena, the biggest arena in Los Angeles when it opened in 1959. (The arena was demolished in 2016 to make way for the Banc of California Stadium, now called BMO Stadium.)
Naidorf says the Sports Arena, home to various Los Angeles sports teams including the NBA’s Lakers (1960-67) and Clippers (1984-1999) and the NHL’s Kings (1967-68), was built to attract sports teams to Los Angeles, but uncertainty about whether they’d catch on meant the facility had to be viable for other purposes.
Advertisement
In 1960, a year after it opened its doors, the Sports Arena hosted the first Democratic National Convention in Los Angeles, where John F. Kennedy became the presidential nominee. Muhammad Ali (then known as Cassius Clay) won a boxing match there in 1962. It also hosted rallies by Martin Luther King Jr. and the Dalai Lama, and saw concerts by legendary rock acts including the Grateful Dead.
Bruce Springsteen played the venue’s final concerts before the building was demolished, a three-night stint during which he dedicated his song “Wrecking Ball” to the building lovingly nicknamed “The Dump That Still Jumps.” “Well, it was pretty dumpy by the end,” Naidorf says, laughing. “Not all architecture is permanent,” he continues. “I’d rather it was demolished and some useful purpose made of the site than having it sit there old, shabby and neglected as it was.”
Naidorf’s credits also include the Beverly Hilton Hotel, the Beverly Center and the Reagan State Office Building downtown. Outside of Los Angeles, Naidorf helmed the restoration of the California State Capitol Building in Sacramento, a six-year undertaking and then the largest-ever restoration undertaken in the U.S., and he designed President Gerald Ford’s house in Rancho Mirage.
The tallest building in Arizona, the Valley National Bank building (now Chase Tower) in Phoenix, also was designed by Naidorf, as well as the Hyatt Regency Dallas and adjacent Reunion Tower, the most recognizable landmark of the city’s skyline.
Advertisement
He details these and his other high-profile projects in his 2018 book “More Humane: An Architectural Memoir”, filled with photos, backstories and personal anecdotes. Flipping through its pages, one learns that Naidorf not only took risks designing his projects but even risked his job on occasion.
He writes in his memoir that in 1958, when he was designing the Humble Oil (now Exxon) headquarters in Houston, he refused to design separate locker rooms and drinking fountains for Black and white people, as the company asked him to. When he went home on that Friday night, he describes not knowing if he’d have a job the following Monday. Not only did Naidorf not lose his job, he says, but the company ceased segregating its locker rooms and drinking fountains after that.
“I realized architects have access to some of the most powerful people in the world and it is our job to bring up issues that represent social issues rather than just architectural design,” he says. “The only thing for evil to triumph is for good people to remain silent. Architects should not remain silent.”
Naidorf also understood that sometimes he was designing projects where people don’t want to be, like the Naval Medical Center in San Diego, which opened in 1988. “I felt that there were two emotions we had to contend with,” he says. “One was to lay the sense that this would be welcoming and have a more personal quality. But if you go to a hospital you want a quite contradictory thing. You want to have a sense that it’s state-of-the-art, that whatever powerful forces can cure you, they’re there.”
Instead of one medical building, which he felt would seem ominous, he designed several structures and a series of outdoor walkways to make the facility feel warm and comforting. The treatment and diagnostic part of the facility was bold, with an abundance of steel and glass. Walkways were lined with floor-to-ceiling glass to allow patients to see the outdoor courtyard, grass, trees, sky and distant views of a golf course “based on the primitive feeling you have in the hospital, which is to get out of the damn place,” he says.
Advertisement
When he was out shopping a few months ago, Naidorf met a woman who mentioned that she had been in the Navy, forcing her to move around a lot when her son was battling childhood leukemia. Without knowing she was talking to the Naval Medical Center’s designer himself, she told Naidorf that it was the only hospital that didn’t scare her ill 6-year-old son, who has since made a full recovery.
“What kind of an architect…,” Naidorf says, overcome with emotion and his voice breaking, “do you have to be not to hold that as better than any design award?”
Though Naidorf had risen through Welton Becket & Associates’ ranks to become vice president, director of research and director of design, he grew increasingly unhappy after the firm’s merger with Ellerbe Associates (it was renamed Ellerbe Becket). He moved into academia full-time in 1990, spending just one day a week at the firm.
Naidorf became dean of the School of Architecture and Design at Woodbury University, earning numerous distinctions, including teacher, faculty member and administrator of the year. He was also a guest professor at UCLA, USC, Cal Poly Pomona and SCI-Arc. At his retirement ceremony in 2000, he was awarded an honorary doctorate, marking not only the end of his academic career but also his time in Los Angeles.
Advertisement
Charmed by the beauty of Northern California, Naidorf moved up the coast to Santa Rosa. For the next 15 years, he continued working with Woodbury University as campus architect, designing and remodeling some of its buildings, and was invited to be a board member.
When he parted ways with Woodbury at 87 years old, it was not with the goal of taking it easy. Naidorf had other pursuits in mind, including his work with City Vision Santa Rosa revitalizing the city’s downtown area.
He also helped his close friend, Mike Harkins (who edited Naidorf’s memoir), design his new house free of charge after the 2017 Tubbs Fire burned Harkins’ home to the ground and he and his wife lost 99% of their belongings.
“Lou offered without solicitation: ‘I’d like to design your house,’” Harkins says. “To me or anyone else who knows him, it was a heartfelt offer that of course he would make, and yet so much more. One analogy might be if Eric Clapton said, ‘I’d like to play at your wedding.’ The knowledge and sensibility that comes along with a Naidorf design offering is huge, just like his heart.”
Most recently, Naidorf has been experimenting with plans for a project to help people who are unhoused.
Advertisement
Naidorf has made the most of his architecture license over the last 71 years. His voice fills with pride when he reveals that he holds the earliest issued active architecture license in the state of California, obtained in 1952.
“It’s something I wanted to be since I was a little kid. My architecture license was so hard to come by. I don’t want to give it up,” he says with palpable emotion. “I don’t want to be retired. I want to be an architect until I fall over. I plan to be buried as a licensed architect.”
Of recently turning 95, he jokes that he feels like a bad vaudeville performer who soon will be pulled offstage by a hook. But Naidorf remains in remarkably good health after surviving both prostate and esophageal cancer in his 80s.
To keep his brain sharp, he does exercises including counting backward from 100 by sevens and taking IQ tests online.
As a nonagenarian, he says there is no key to living a long life. He suggests, though, that it helps to try to use it well. “It’s not how big the steak is but how tasty it is,” he says. “I think you have to seek a calling, listen for it and search for it. Find something in your life that is really yours. … Get engaged with something that’s going to scare you, something where the problems are hard. And take risks. There is no failure.”
He also notes the importance of adaptability. “I have had four marriages. I’d better be resilient,” he quips. Twice divorced and twice widowed, Naidorf has a daughter from his first marriage, four stepchildren (who call him “Dad”) from his fourth marriage, 11 grandchildren and six great-grandchildren. An intensely private man, he’s reticent to speak publicly about his relationships and family, preferring to focus on his work.
“I remain so fascinated with architecture,” he says. “I cannot even walk past a store where somebody is putting in an electrical outlet without stopping to look in and watch it.”
Advertisement
The chatty Naidorf turns summarily succinct, saying, “I certainly have had a good run.”