Job recruiters in the South are facing hurdles to attract skilled professionals from the Midwest despite offering competitive compensation packages, according to a Bloomberg report published Friday. That’s because many of these potential hires are locked into super-low 30-year mortgages.
During the fourth quarter of 2023, the proportion of job seekers in the U.S. who relocated for employment dwindled to a mere 1.5%. That marked the lowest level on record, according to a survey by Challenger, Gray & Christmas.
Janet Rivera Jones, founder of Florida-based 5 Star Global Recruitment Partners, told Bloomberg that potential hires who are repaying low-interest mortgages are often reluctant to move unless they’re offered relocation packages that account for the differential in housing costs.
According to an analysis conducted by Bloomberg on data from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, approximately one-fifth of U.S. homeowners carry mortgages with interest rates below 3%, while nearly 35% have rates ranging between 3% and 4%. Current rates for a 30-year fixed mortgage are about 7% and have more than doubled since hitting a historic low point of 2.85% in December 2020.
Meanwhile, the costs associated with employee relocations are on the rise. For mid-level managers, average relocation expenditures in the U.S. last year stood at $78,330 for homeowners and $33,349 for renters, according to data from ARC Relocation, a consultancy that offers employee relocation assistance for federal agencies and corporate clients.
“We’re turning down way more deals than we’re doing,” Franklin told Bloomberg. “It’s a low, low risk, low-yield game that we’re playing.” Read more: Three strategies to mitigate risk in real estate investing in 2024 Kevin Gould, CEO of the California Bankers Association, argued that banks follow “safe and sound lending practices” that should ensure … [Read more…]
Federal Home Loan Bank reform is in the air in Washington D.C.
The White House recently endorsed a plan to double FHLBanks’ mandatory contributions to affordable housing programs from 10 to 20% of their net income, following a recommendation by the Federal Housing Finance Agency. And the Coalition for Federal Home Loan Bank Reform, a group that I chair and started as a small group of D.C. insiders, has become a true coalition of nine national organizations representing hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Despite billions of dollars in public support, few Americans know about FHLBanks. The Federal Home Loan Bank system is made up of 11 regional banks that pass on discounted loans to their membership of banks, credit unions, and insurance companies. As a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE), the FHLBank system is Congressionally chartered to receive unique subsidies, tax exemptions, and powers, in exchange for providing the public benefits of supporting affordable housing and community development.
The Congressional Budget Office published a new report, which for the first time in two decades put a dollar amount on the public subsidies that FHLBanks receive, estimating that in 2024 the FHLBank system will receive $7.3 billion dollars(!) in government subsidies.
As I show in Figure 1, this subsidy partly flows from the FHLBanks’ tax-free status and regulatory exemptions. But the bulk of the subsidy comes from the way GSE status confers an “implied federal guarantee” on FHLBank debt: the perception that the federal government will stand for FHLBank debt if the system fails. CBO concluded that GSE status reduced FHLBanks borrowing costs by 0.4% and noted that if the system was “private instead of public” its credit rating would fall to AA or A instead of the current AA+ rating. None of these subsidies require Congressional appropriations but rely on federal guarantees, including the high costs of public bailout, were the FHLBanks to fail.
Under the current system, most of these billions in public subsidies flow on as private profits, rather than support public benefits. Congress mandates that FHLBanks devote 10% of their net income every year to affordable housing programs, which support affordable housing development and downpayment assistance. But that meant that in 2023, FHLBanks only paid $355 million towards Affordable Housing Programs while paying out nearly 10x that amount, or $3.4 billion, as dividends! Through these payouts, FHLBanks are redistributing a public subsidy as a profit to banks and insurance companies.
FHLBanks still believe in trickle-down economics. They claim that their discounted loans and dividends to members may trickle down to consumers in the form of discounted mortgage rates. However, many of their members are not even in the mortgage business anymore: a Bloomberg investigation found that 42% of FHLBank members had not originated a single mortgage over the last five years. It is unclear how cheap loans and big dividend payouts to insurance companies help Americans buy their first house or find an affordable rental.
Even the technocratic, impartial CBO questions this twisted system when it dryly noted in its report: “Other stakeholders of FHLBs, including the executives and owners of banks, might also realize benefits.” That is, parts of today’s public subsidy simply go towards supporting seven-figure executive pay at the 11 FHLBanks.
Whether it is coming from the White House, the FHFA, the Congressional Budget Office, or the Coalition, the status quo at FHLBanks is unacceptable. Wasteful government spending, especially amidst a national housing crisis where both parties are seeking solutions to our housing supply shortage, is a bipartisan issue.
Congress should demand greater accountability on how these public subsidies support public benefits. They can start by passing legislation that greatly improves the Affordable Housing Program contributions that FHLBanks make, from the current meager 10% to at least 30% – a set-aside that FHLBanks have shown they can sustainably make when they paid REFCORP contributions from 1989 to 2011.
I think it is time that the public learned about FHLBanks and how they are skirting their responsibility to help support our nation’s housing troubles. There is so much untapped potential here: imagine having the full leverage of $7.3 billion in public subsidies to truly support imaginative housing solutions.
Sharon Cornelissen is the chair of the Coalition for Federal Home Loan Bank Reform and Director of Housing at the Consumer Federation of America, a national pro-consumer advocacy and research non-profit.
Waiting out rate cuts “not worth it” for some sellers While the market remains competitive, with homes typically going under contract within 17 days of listing, the slight increase in inventory comes as good news for prospective homebuyers that have been navigating a market characterized by limited supply. As borrowing costs remain high, many homeowners … [Read more…]
The economic landscape of the United States is experiencing a significant shift, marked by a new event: the average FICO credit score has dropped for the first time in a decade.
In a recently released report on credit score data from October 2023, major credit reporting company, FICO, says that the national average credit score has decreased for the first time in a decade from 718 to 717.
Why did credit scores drop?
The decrease in average credit scores may be attributed to several key factors:
Increased Missed Payments: There has been an increase in missed borrower payments, showing serious financial strain among consumers. The FICO report shows that, as of October 2023, more than 18% of the population was late on payments.
Rising Consumer Debt Levels: Consumer debt, particularly credit card debt, has risen to over 1 trillion. This indicates that more consumers may be leaning on credit cards to cover everyday expenses.
Slowing New Credit Activity: New credit activity – consumers applying for new lines of credit – has slowed down.
What this means for you
It’s hard to say what this will mean moving forward, but at this moment it’s too soon to say – or worry too much. In a statement given to Bloomberg, Ethan Dornhelm, VP at FICO, said that “This isn’t a blinking red light, but it certainly is a yellow light.”
Whatever happens in the future, it’s important to take steps to try to protect your credit. Here are some strategies:
Reduce Credit Utilization Rates: Your credit utilization ratio is the amount of available credit you have compared to the amount of credit you’ve used. Generally, the best practice is to keep your credit utilization ratio below 30%, if you can.
Consolidate Debt: If you’re worried about tracking different payments, consider consolidating your debt into one payment to avoid the risk of missing a payment. A missed payment is a negative mark on your credit, and can stay on your credit reports for 7 years.
Protect Your Credit History: Length of credit history is a significant factor in how your credit score is calculated. Closing a credit card that you’ve had for a long time, for example, might actually hurt your credit score. If you can, try to keep lines of credit – especially revolving credit accounts, like credit cards – open.
If You’re Rejected, Pause Before Applying Again: If you’ve been rejected for a line of credit in the past, like an auto loan or a credit card, pause before immediately applying again. Multiple “hard inquiries” – when a lender pulls your credit to evaluate your creditworthiness – in too short a time could potentially harm your credit.
Good credit is always important
If you’re worried about your credit, the best thing you can do is consistently check and monitor your credit – not just your score. Be on the look out for any changes to your credit reports and score, whether expected or unexpected, and make sure that everything in your credit profile is accurate. You can get started with a free credit assessment at Lexington Law for a snapshot of what’s in your credit profile.
Reviewed By
Nature Lewis
Associate Attorney
Before joining Lexington Law as an Associate Attorney, Nature Lewis managed a successful practice representing tenants in Maricopa County.
Through her representation of tenants, Nature gained experience in Federal law, Family law, Probate, Consumer protection and Civil law. She received numerous accolades for her dedication to Tenant Protection in Arizona, including, John P. Frank Advocate for Justice Award in 2016, Top 50 Pro Bono Attorney of 2015, New Tenant Attorney of the Year in 2015 and Maricopa County Attorney of the Month in March 2015. Nature continued her dedication to pro bono work while volunteering at Community Legal Services’ Volunteer Lawyer’s Program and assisting victims of Domestic Violence at the local shelter. Nature is passionate about providing free knowledge to the underserved community and continues to hold free seminars about tenant rights and plans to incorporate consumer rights in her free seminars. Nature is a wife and mother of 5 children. She and her husband have been married for 24 years and enjoy traveling internationally, watching movies and promoting their indie published comic books!
Stav Gaon, from Academy Securities Inc., pointed out that this could be the largest holdback ever witnessed in this segment of the US securities market. This move not only poses immediate financial implications for the investors involved but also introduces a layer of unpredictability regarding how servicers will handle troubled assets moving forward. “This is … [Read more…]
For banks, credit unions and other small-business lenders, this is an IRS-related story with a happy ending — kind of.
Responding to a determined lobbying campaign by a broad consortium of financial services trade groups, the U.S. tax-collection agency has agreed to suspend a policy change that would have blocked small-business lenders from accessing borrowers’ income data through its Income Verification Express Service.
“We acknowledge the concerns raised and are assessing our ability to provide return information when necessary while keeping taxpayer information confidential and protected from disclosure,” the IRS wrote in a March 6 policy update statement. “Although IRS announced the policy change on January 2, 2024, we are suspending that change as we seek input from you and other stakeholders on possible changes and impacts to the program.”
Scott Stewart, CEO of the Innovative Lending Platform Association, acknowledged that the IRS could revert to its original policy stance after its review. At the same time, even a temporary respite represents a major achievement, Stewart said.
“Federal agencies don’t do this,” Stewart said in an interview. “To get a federal agency of any kind, let alone the IRS, [to acknowledge a misstep] is really exceptionally rare. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a reversal like this. The IRS deserves credit for realizing this policy requires further review.”
The Innovative Lending Platform Association was one of 11 financial services industry trade groups, including the Independent Community Bankers of America, American Bankers Association, America’s Credit Unions and the Mortgage Bankers Association, that endorsed a Jan. 24 comment letter opposing the IVES policy change. IVES is the platform that lets taxpayers give third parties — like lenders — permission to see tax return or wage information.
Under the IRS’ original concept, it would have delivered tax data only to lenders making mortgages. In all other instances, the agency would have delivered the data directly to individual taxpayers to protect their privacy.
Lenders value the ability to obtain tax returns from the IRS as a critical tool in underwriting and preventing fraud. They were concerned the policy change would add complexity, time and cost to applications while at the same time making it easier for bad actors to game the system.
“You could see how fraudsters might just digitally alter their tax returns and they could send it off to the lender,” Stewart said. “I hope they’re going to move toward [opening] the system in an [application programming interface] fashion so that everyone can get access and overall lower the cost of credit and capital for small businesses, consumers, people looking for insurance — everybody.”
An application programming interface, or API, is software code that allows a website, application or program to more easily share information with other websites, applications or programs.
In their announcement last week, IRS officials “said they were suspending the decision indefinitely,” Ryan Metcalf, head of public affairs for Funding Circle US, said in an interview. “I’m not concerned it’s coming back. It seems like the IRS has backed off. … This is a huge win for American consumers and small businesses.”
It’s far from game over, though.
“It’s good news [the IRS] has returned to the status quo,” Metcalf said. “We still have issues to resolve. We still have to work out how we resolve the authentication issue, can we have private APIaccess to log in, can we expand the data in the transcript — all of those things we’re still seeking are outstanding.”
Beyond access to tax data, lenders and borrowers want the IRS to make it easier to use IVES. Currently, borrowers have to create IRS accounts and verify their identities with the agency before they can request that a transcript be delivered to a lender. That route is time-consuming and redundant, since the lenders themselves are required to verify identity under know-your-customer requirements, Metcalf said.
“The [optimal] outcome is we want a borrower to be able to submit a [transcript request] to the lender, the lender hands that to the IRS and we get the tax return in real time,” Metcalf said. “Or, if the lender has an account with the IRS already, they should just be able to log in to that account in our application. That’s the API access. … That’s what we want. We want that optionality of either/or.”
Bipartisan legislation introduced in the House of Representatives in May 2023 would address the authentication issue by enabling taxpayers to designate a financial institution or other service provider to receive tax data. The bill, introduced by North Carolina Republican Patrick McHenry, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee; California Democratic Rep. Jimmy Panetta; and Colorado Democratic Rep. Brittany Petterson, is currently under consideration by the Ways and Means Committee.
Funding Circle backs the legislation as it is currently written and is hoping to strengthen its language in the wake of the IRS’ action. “We’re getting ready to update that bill to address additional issues. … We would probably add on to it to make sure the IRS doesn’t revisit this policy decision,” Metcalf said.
The IRS didn’t respond to a request for comment at deadline.
Stewart attributed the IRS’ initial policy restricting IVES access to a desire to protect taxpayer information. “Their duty is paramount,” Stewart said, but he was quick to add that allowing API interface with IVES could be accomplished without compromising data integrity. “We don’t think creating this API is going to do anything to endanger the taxpayer, as long as you have them making the request directly through the lender or the insurance company or the bank.”
The lawsuit alleges that Wells Fargo systematically discriminated against minority loan applicants, leading to denials, delays, and less favorable loan terms. It references a Bloomberg report from March 10, 2022, which highlighted disparities in loan approvals between White Americans and minority groups, based on data Wells Fargo disclosed under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Read … [Read more…]