Browse by Topic

Source: mint.intuit.com

Apache is functioning normally

After the previous mortgage boom and subsequent crash, many questions were asked regarding what exactly went wrong.

There was plenty of finger pointing, from overreliance on credit scores, to endless investor speculation, to Wall St. packaging substandard mortgages and the government’s accommodative policies.

But one source of blame that kept resurfacing was the prevalence of high-risk loan products, such as the option arm.

Others blamed “subprime” for the housing crash, though that infamous eight-letter word was often used as a one-size-fits-all definition for any mortgage that went bad.

Regardless, it was clear that shoddy mortgages held some material amount of blame for the previous crisis.

After all, many of the loans were destined to fail, seeing that the teaser rates offered were the only way one could afford the property to begin with.

Today’s Mortgages Are Pristine

If you want to compare the previous housing run-up to that of today’s, you should consider the mortgages behind the properties being purchased.

Back during the mid-2000s, the quality of mortgages was awful. Scores of homeowners were purchasing properties with credit scores well below 620, which is the subprime cutoff.

Additionally, these borrowers were purchasing homes with zero down financing, or worse, with zero documentation. Not to mention many of the properties were non-owner occupied four-unit properties, often with second mortgages stuck at 12%.

One of the most common loan documentation types was stated income, which allowed borrowers (or their loan reps) to put any amount of monthly income they’d like in the box on the application.

This was all good and well in the eyes of pretty much everyone because it banked on home prices soaring ever higher, despite already chalking massive gains.

The idea, in short, was that it didn’t matter if the borrower was sound if the property was expected to surge in value.

At worse, the borrower could refinance again or sell (for a profit) if they couldn’t keep up with their mortgage payments. We all know how badly that ended…

Just a few short years later, the quality of mortgages has done a complete 180. The average credit score for newly originated loans is north of 700. Additionally, average LTVs have dropped, meaning borrowers have home equity in case something goes wrong.

If anything, LTVs are going to keep dropping as bidding wars force new homeowners to put more down in order to get their offers accepted.

At the same time, more and more borrowers are opting for long-term fixed-rate mortgages, and with mortgage rates are at or near record lows, it makes for a pretty solid bet (even Buffett backs it).

The low rates are good for the housing market because it means homes are more affordable in payment terms, and it also means many previously stuck with higher rates can refinance.

Even those with underwater mortgages have benefited, thanks to HARP 2.0, which erased the LTV ceiling.

Yes, there will be consequences of this quantitative easing down the road, but for now, quality mortgages are being originated at rock-bottom rates.

And some banks are even compensating their loan officers based on loan quality, as opposed to loan volume.

Is This a Housing Boom or a Mortgage Boom?

You almost have to question whether this is a play on housing, or a play on getting a mortgage at a ridiculously low rate.

If mortgage rates were closer to historic norms, would prospective home buyers have the same voracious appetite?

My guess would be no, seeing that home prices have already returned to fairly high levels in many parts of country.

In fact, they aren’t too far off their previous bubble highs in some regions, meaning the low rates must be part of the equation.

Still, if and when rates do rise, it doesn’t mean home prices will plummet like they did before. It will probably result in a cooling off period, but that doesn’t equate to a bubble bursting.

[Mortgage rates vs. home prices]

The reason most people lost their homes or walked away during the previous crisis was due to a lack of home equity (and down payment), coupled with an unsustainable housing payment.

Today’s borrowers are a lot more qualified and invested, holding mortgages they can truly afford. This makes owning long term a lot more attractive, even if home prices have shot up recently.

These homeowners will be able to sit tight and enjoy their low, low fixed housing payments, even if home prices bounce around a bit. Why walk away from that?

Read more: How it became a bad time to buy a home.

Source: thetruthaboutmortgage.com

Apache is functioning normally

Often times student loans get in the way of a mortgage because of the tremendous monthly debt, but fintech lender SoFi wants to create the opposite effect.

They’ve launched their so-called “Student Loan Payoff ReFi,” which as the name implies, is a way to get rid of student loan debt while refinancing the mortgage.

The general idea is that mortgage rates (at the moment) are lower than the interest rates on student loans, meaning borrowers can save money by shuffling debt to their existing mortgage balance.

Apparently 8.5 million households have student debt obligations, so this mechanism could equal a lot of savings, and a lot of originations for SoFi.

The program is being offered in conjunction with Fannie Mae, and is apparently cheaper than a traditional cash out refinance.

How the SoFi Student Loan Payoff ReFi Works

Say a student (or I suppose a parent) owns a home with a mortgage balance of $200,000 at 67% LTV, and there is also outstanding student loan debt of $40,000.

This hypothetical homeowner can combine the two debts into one and enjoy a lower interest rate, despite a higher LTV.

This example would push the LTV to 80%, likely the maximum under the program, but the rate would still be a competitive 3.75% or so on a 30-year fixed.

The payment would be even cheaper because student loans often amortize over a shorter period, such as 20 years. But the lower combined rate would offset the longer amortization period.

SoFi will actually disburse the funds directly to the servicer of the student loan debt, instead of just giving the borrower cash at closing.

Because the funds are going straight to the student loan company, instead of the bank account of the homeowner, there is less perceived risk.

After all, in general homeowners are welcome to tap equity to use for whatever they’d like, including paying off other loans. But lenders assume more risk if the funds can be used for any purpose, such as buying a Hummer.

This might explain why the interest rates on this product are more competitive than typical rates tied to a cash out refinance.

Still Explore All Options

Borrowers might get a rate closer to what they’d expect to receive via a rate and term refinance, the latter of which involves no cash to the borrower.

It might also be easier to qualify if the to-be-paid-off student loan debt no longer bumps up the DTI ratio to unacceptable levels.

This program works for both those who manage their own student debt and those who have a co-signer on the student loan such as a parent.

Per Experian data, the average homeowner with an outstanding co-signed student loan has a balance of $36,000, while those with Parent PLUS loans have $33,000 in outstanding debt.

The Parent PLUS loan is a private offering and apparently 90% of private student loans required a co-signer. They also tend to come with interest rates that are higher than current mortgage rates.

The one downside to a program like this is that the funds can only be used for one purpose. And your home loan debt will grow, which could potentially put your primary residence at risk.

As noted, a traditional cash out refinance allows you to tap equity and use funds for any reason. In a nutshell, you get more flexibility.

However, the interest rate might be higher than this product from SoFi. Of course, you’d still want to shop around to see if you can get the best of both worlds.

You might be able to snag a low rate without sacrificing any flexibility.

Source: thetruthaboutmortgage.com