President Joe Biden, in his ongoing crusade against hidden junk fees, has so far cracked down on event ticketing, airlines, financial companies and rental housing. The next target: junk fees at colleges and in student lending.
On Friday, the Biden administration announced several new actions to alleviate the burden of these superfluous fees. The most significant would be the elimination of origination fees for federal student loans — if it passes muster with Congress.
“We feel strongly that there are times where the American consumer is kind of played for a sucker,” says Neera Tanden, domestic policy advisor to Biden. “There’s a hidden fee or there’s some way in which a company or an entity is basically using its market power to make you pay a fee that you shouldn’t have to.”
Junk fees are the label given to the irksome and often surprise surcharges to what you’re already paying for. This includes things like credit card late fees, overdraft fees at banks, amenity and resort fees at hotels, service fees for event ticketing or food delivery, as well as seat selection fees on airlines. For over a year, the Biden administration has taken several actions to curb junk fees and surface hidden fees.
End student loan origination fees
On the student lending side, Biden would eliminate the student loan origination fee as part of his 2025 budget proposal.
Origination fees are the percentage of the loan amount that’s considered a processing fee. The fee ends up being tacked on to loan balances, which means borrowers would pay interest on the fee over the life of the loan. Origination fee rates range from 1% for undergraduate loans to 4% for graduate and parent PLUS loans.
Tanden, who spoke with NerdWallet in an exclusive interview, calls origination fees a “relic of the past” when private lenders originated student loans backed by the government, which hasn’t been the case since 2010 when the federal government began exclusively lending directly rather than guaranteeing loans made by private financial institutions. She adds that there’s no current rationale for it in federal student lending.
Borrowers collectively spend more than $1 billion annually on origination fees, according to a release by the administration. However, Biden can’t get rid of origination fees unless Congress approves it as part of the nation’s 2025 budget.
Tanden says she hopes the proposal will be treated as a nonpartisan issue. “We know that Republicans have welcomed ways to cut back on taxes for people,” she says. “This is really just a tax on student borrowing.”
If origination fees are eliminated, it would impact future student loans only, not existing debt.
Eliminate junk fees with student banking products
The college-related fees Biden is targeting include “high and unusual fees” associated with student financial products. Colleges and universities often offer bank accounts and credit cards as part of affiliations with financial institutions. These fees include insufficient funds fees, maintenance fees and closure fees.
Biden wants to block financial companies that partner with colleges to disburse Title IV funds (such as student loans) from charging fees to students. The administration says these junk fees are out of step since banks have largely phased them out.
The measure to end junk fees for college banking and student credit cards is currently in the formal process known as negotiated rulemaking. Though it doesn’t require approval by Congress, don’t expect a change anytime soon.
Empower students to authorize tuition charges for textbooks
Many colleges and universities have long included textbooks as part of students’ tuition bills. That means that the charge is automatically included and students have to pay for course materials regardless of the actual costs available on the market. Students might be able to find textbooks cheaper somewhere else, but colleges still bundle those anticipated costs as part of tuition.
Biden is proposing that students be required to authorize a charge on their tuition bill for textbooks and other required materials for their courses. The administration says these changes would provide students with the opportunity to do a cost comparison to find the cheapest options or eliminate the cost altogether by accessing free open-source textbooks.
“The college has a lot of power and sway and these are ways that, you know, essentially consumers — your students — are forced to pay for things that they should be able to look at cheaper costs,” says Tanden.
These changes are also in the negotiated rulemaking process and don’t require congressional approval.
Require colleges to return unused ‘flex dollars’ and meal plans
Students are often required to purchase meal plans with their college or university, which are used for dining hall meals or as “flex dollars” to pay for food elsewhere on campus. But at the end of each semester, schools can rescind any remaining funds. That means students must spend the money before the semester ends or forfeit what they’ve already paid for — often with student loans.
“Students are often taking on debt in their college years to pay for the cost of living, as well as their tuition, and because of interest that could grow in cost,” says Tanden.
The Biden administration would halt colleges from taking leftover funds and instead require them to return the remaining dollars to students.
The administration announced it is now formally considering this regulation. It would need to move through the negotiated rulemaking process and wouldn’t need approval by Congress.
Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images News via Getty Images
President Joe Biden, in his ongoing crusade against hidden junk fees, has so far cracked down on event ticketing, airlines, financial companies and rental housing. The next target: junk fees at colleges and in student lending.
On Friday, the Biden administration announced several new actions to alleviate the burden of these superfluous fees. The most significant would be the elimination of origination fees for federal student loans — if it passes muster with Congress.
“We feel strongly that there are times where the American consumer is kind of played for a sucker,” says Neera Tanden, domestic policy advisor to Biden. “There’s a hidden fee or there’s some way in which a company or an entity is basically using its market power to make you pay a fee that you shouldn’t have to.”
Junk fees are the label given to the irksome and often surprise surcharges to what you’re already paying for. This includes things like credit card late fees, overdraft fees at banks, amenity and resort fees at hotels, service fees for event ticketing or food delivery, as well as seat selection fees on airlines. For over a year, the Biden administration has taken several actions to curb junk fees and surface hidden fees.
End student loan origination fees
On the student lending side, Biden would eliminate the student loan origination fee as part of his 2025 budget proposal.
Origination fees are the percentage of the loan amount that’s considered a processing fee. The fee ends up being tacked on to loan balances, which means borrowers would pay interest on the fee over the life of the loan. Origination fee rates range from 1% for undergraduate loans to 4% for graduate and parent PLUS loans.
Tanden, who spoke with NerdWallet in an exclusive interview, calls origination fees a “relic of the past” when private lenders originated student loans backed by the government, which hasn’t been the case since 2010 when the federal government began exclusively lending directly rather than guaranteeing loans made by private financial institutions. She adds that there’s no current rationale for it in federal student lending.
Borrowers collectively spend more than $1 billion annually on origination fees, according to a release by the administration. However, Biden can’t get rid of origination fees unless Congress approves it as part of the nation’s 2025 budget.
Tanden says she hopes the proposal will be treated as a nonpartisan issue. “We know that Republicans have welcomed ways to cut back on taxes for people,” she says. “This is really just a tax on student borrowing.”
If origination fees are eliminated, it would impact future student loans only, not existing debt.
Eliminate junk fees with student banking products
The college-related fees Biden is targeting include “high and unusual fees” associated with student financial products. Colleges and universities often offer bank accounts and credit cards as part of affiliations with financial institutions. These fees include insufficient funds fees, maintenance fees and closure fees.
Biden wants to block financial companies that partner with colleges to disburse Title IV funds (such as student loans) from charging fees to students. The administration says these junk fees are out of step since banks have largely phased them out.
The measure to end junk fees for college banking and student credit cards is currently in the formal process known as negotiated rulemaking. Though it doesn’t require approval by Congress, don’t expect a change anytime soon.
Empower students to authorize tuition charges for textbooks
Many colleges and universities have long included textbooks as part of students’ tuition bills. That means that the charge is automatically included and students have to pay for course materials regardless of the actual costs available on the market. Students might be able to find textbooks cheaper somewhere else, but colleges still bundle those anticipated costs as part of tuition.
Biden is proposing that students be required to authorize a charge on their tuition bill for textbooks and other required materials for their courses. The administration says these changes would provide students with the opportunity to do a cost comparison to find the cheapest options or eliminate the cost altogether by accessing free open-source textbooks.
“The college has a lot of power and sway and these are ways that, you know, essentially consumers — your students — are forced to pay for things that they should be able to look at cheaper costs,” says Tanden.
These changes are also in the negotiated rulemaking process and don’t require congressional approval.
Require colleges to return unused ‘flex dollars’ and meal plans
Students are often required to purchase meal plans with their college or university, which are used for dining hall meals or as “flex dollars” to pay for food elsewhere on campus. But at the end of each semester, schools can rescind any remaining funds. That means students must spend the money before the semester ends or forfeit what they’ve already paid for — often with student loans.
“Students are often taking on debt in their college years to pay for the cost of living, as well as their tuition, and because of interest that could grow in cost,” says Tanden.
The Biden administration would halt colleges from taking leftover funds and instead require them to return the remaining dollars to students.
The administration announced it is now formally considering this regulation. It would need to move through the negotiated rulemaking process and wouldn’t need approval by Congress.
Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images News via Getty Images
A day after targeting the title insurance industry, the Biden Administration has put the rest of the real estate finance process in its crosshairs.
On March 8, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau posted a blog inviting consumers to tell it how “junk fees” in the closing process affect them.
While not able to speak to the specifics of the posting, nor about any possible actions the regulator might take, the Community Home Lenders of America “is thrilled that they’re jumping into this,” Scott Olson, its executive director, said in an interview.
“We’ve actually used this phrase [junk fees] ourselves a couple of years or so ago” he said in regards to click fees lenders are charged by third party vendors, which are passed on to consumers.
Others in the industry had a hard time understanding where the CFPB was coming from.
“The CFPB’s blog post is baffling and reveals little understanding of how the mortgage market works or awareness of its own regulations that provide for full fee transparency and limits on what can be charged,” Bob Broeksmit, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association, said in a lengthy statement.
“The fees mentioned are clearly disclosed to borrowers well before a home purchase on forms developed and prescribed by the Dodd-Frank Act and the CFPB itself,” he added, referring to the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosures, also known as TRID. One of those disclosures, the loan estimate, is given when the borrower contacts the originator and is supposed to be used to shop.
The other form – the closing disclosure presented at the end of the process – must be within certain tolerances of the data provided on the loan estimate.
“In 2020, the CFPB issued a report praising its own rule for improving consumers’ ability to locate key information, compare terms and costs between initial disclosures and final disclosures, and compare terms and costs across mortgage offers,” Broeksmit said.
But in Olson’s view, “transparency is not the same as competition.”
The CHLA has been supportive of the use of title insurance alternatives like attorney opinion letters, that could reduce costs to borrowers.
“We think that opening up the line of sight on some of these things is reasonable where there really is not competition,” Olson said.
CHLA plans to “comment vigorously” to the CFPB, he continued, adding that it has done so regarding competition and fees charges in the not-so-distant past, particularly in regards to the Intercontinental Exchange purchase of Black Knight.
As far back as 2003, if not even earlier, the government has had so-called mortgage junk fees in its crosshairs. Mel Martinez, Department of Housing and Urban Development secretary under President George W. Bush, said in a speech before the National Community Reinvestment Coalition almost exactly 11 years ago that members of Congress did not understand that reform proposal would help consumers understand the mortgage process and the costs involved so they don’t become “victims” of junk fees and broker abuse.
The CFPB, in its recent post, took its own shot at the lender policy portion of title insurance, saying the borrower has no control or options.
“Instead of paying this fee themselves, lenders make borrowers pay the cost,” said the blog posting authored by Julie Margetta Morgan, associate director. “The amount that borrowers pay for lender’s title insurance is often much greater than the risk.”
The CHLA has been supportive of the use of title insurance alternatives like attorney opinion letters, that could reduce costs to borrowers.
“We think that opening up the line of sight on some of these things is reasonable where there really is not competition,” Olson said.
The American Land Title Association issued commentary on the CFPB blog.
“Reform of mortgage closing costs is unnecessary,” the ALTA response said. “The contradictory use of the term ‘junk fee’ conflicts with the White House’s own definition, which cites the lack of disclosure of the fee being charged.”
Credit reports also were specifically mentioned as a problem area in the CFPB posting, claiming the business lacks competition and choice.
“The CFPB has heard reports of recent costs spiking 25% to as much as 400%,” the agency said. “At the same time, we estimate that nationwide credit reporting companies made over $1.3 billion annually.”
CFPB is also looking for consumer comment on the payment of discount points, although the posting does not distinguish between temporary and permanent rate buydowns.
“We are paying particular attention to the recent rise in discount points,” the posting said. “A higher percentage of borrowers reported paying discount points in 2022 than any other years since this data point was first reported in 2018.”
The agency said 50.2% of home purchase borrowers paid some discount points in 2022, with the median dollar amount being $2,370, up from 32.1% and $1,225 one year earlier.
The Biden Administration has just unveiled a number of proposals to make homeownership more affordable.
Aside from legislation to build and renovate more than two million homes, they are calling on Congress to approve a pair of new “mortgage relief credits.”
One targets prospective home buyers grappling with significantly higher mortgage rates, while the other addresses home sellers dealing with mortgage rate lock-in.
Both are intended to increase the supply of homes for sale, which has been below healthy levels for several years now.
The question remains whether incentivizing home buying is what’s necessary for the housing market at the moment.
$5,000 Tax Credit for Two Years for First-Time Home Buyers
The mortgage relief that targets home buyers would provide a tax credit of $5,000 for two years to first-time home buyers.
Generally, this is defined as someone without ownership interest in the three years preceding the home purchase.
In total, these new home buyers could snag $10,000 in tax savings over the first two years.
A tax credit directly reduces your tax bill, unlike a deduction, which simply reduces your taxable income.
This piece of legislation is intended to tackle the high mortgage rates currently available, which nearly tripled from below 3% to above 8% recently.
Per the White House fact sheet, the $10,000 in savings is the equivalent of reducing the borrower’s mortgage rate by more than 1.5 percentage points on a median-priced home.
At last glance, the median home was valued at roughly $418,000. Of course, these savings only exist for two years. More on that in a moment.
The Biden administration believes this credit could help more than 3.5 million middle-class families purchase their very first home over the next two years.
$10,000 Tax Credit for Home Sellers
The other mortgage relief credit would incentivize home sellers, many of whom have been reluctant to sell because of their very cheap mortgages.
Known as the mortgage rate lock-in effect, it’s the concept of staying put for fear of losing your existing mortgage rate if you move. And having to replace it with a much higher one.
To offset this lock-in effect, middle-class families who sell their “starter home” to another owner-occupant would receive a tax credit of up to $10,000.
They define a starter home as one valued below the area median home price in the county where it’s located.
The Biden administration thinks this could unlock homes that no longer fit the needs of many households nationwide, and help an estimated three million families i the process.
On top of these tax credits, they are still pushing for $25,000 in down payment assistance to first-generation home buyers.
And they’re targeting the elimination of certain closing costs, such as lender’s title insurance, which could save the average homeowner $750 when refinancing.
But Won’t This Just Increase Demand at a Time When Supply Is Already Too Low?
While the new proposals might be well-intentioned, one has to wonder if they won’t simply stoke demand at a time when supply remains far too low.
Sure, there’s an incentive to both buy and sell a home with these tax credits, but it’s unclear how many existing owners would sell just to get the $10,000 tax credit.
After all, if they’re sitting on a 2-3% 30-year fixed mortgage rate, it wouldn’t take long for the $10,000 to be absorbed via their new, much higher housing costs.
Just pretend a family holds a $300,000 mortgage set at 2.75%. Their monthly principal and interest payment is $1,224.72.
If they sold and then bought another property for say $400,000 with a rate of 6.5%, their new monthly P&I would be $2,528.27.
That’s a difference of over $1,300 per month, which would eat up the $10,000 credit in less than eight months!
These sellers would also have to incur moving costs, closing costs on a new mortgage, and compete with other home buyers to find a replacement property.
The credit for first-time home buyers could also arguably result in hotter demand, even if more homes were coming online.
Lastly, it seems they’re banking on lower mortgage rates in the near future, at which point these first-time buyers would be able to get more permanent savings beyond year two via a rate and term refinance.
In the end, it appears we’re stuck between a rock and a hard place. Ultimately, the accommodative interest rate policy of the past decade created a serious divide of haves and have nots.
And without a lot more inventory, or perhaps slightly lower mortgage rates that allow transactions to occur naturally again, it might be a while before things normalize again.
I might get a little sentimental today. This is the 20th anniversary of my — well, really our — weekly column. In addition to feeling old, I also feel grateful.
It was actually slightly more than 20 years ago that I was living in Southern California, working as a freelance writer, when an editor from the Orange County Register called. The paper was launching a monthly regional magazine targeting owners of luxury homes — think Laguna and Newport Beach — and he wanted a column that would be the antidote to potentially pretentious content.
“So,” I said, “you want a column that is not about rich homeowners and their chichi architects and their museum-quality art collections and the exquisite homes they build on the bluffs overlooking the Pacific and how the whole experience was one giant lovefest, and they had money left over?”
“Right,” he confirmed, “a reality column.”
He’d found the right writer. At that point, I had built two homes from the ground up, had the debt and cortisol levels to prove it, and had an arsenal of frustrations.
Still disbelieving, I added, “You want me to write about the tile mason with the drinking problem, the neighbors who won’t speak to you because you’ve had an outhouse and a Dumpster parked in your front yard for three months, the dogs who got so fed up with the construction they ran away in search of a rescue, and about how the remodel took three times as long, cost three times as much, and you weren’t speaking to your spouse at the end?”
“Exactly,” he said. “Sprinkle in some advice. Be the girl next door who has the same problems as everyone else but is two steps ahead, because you’ve made the mistakes and know who to call.”
Eighteen months later, my then-husband and I moved from Southern California to Colorado — just one of my many moves. And soon, I had a syndicated column. That former editor congratulated me, then ominously added: “It’s great to have a weekly column, but one day, you are going to run out of ideas.”
Until then, a dry well hadn’t been on my worry list. I flashed back to when I was in kindergarten and got in trouble for talking too much in class. I wound up in the principal’s office with my mother to discuss “the problem.” When the principal asked why I talked so much, the answer was easy. “I just have so many important things to say,” I said, which was unintentionally hilarious.
So here we are 20 years and 1,040 columns later, and I still have things to say and no shortage of topics. Because I have never been able to see where home design stops and home life begins, my columns are about both. Here’s a brief look back at some of the moments we’ve been through together:
The calamities: You were there when my two custom seven-foot sofas arrived with the upholstery fabric inside out, when the back patio in our new Colorado home fell three feet into a sink hole, and when our rescue dog on his first night with us tested our commitment on the one-day-old living room carpet. (Who gets a new dog and new carpet on the same day?)
The many moves: You were there through 10 houses and nine moves, including the move to Florida, where I had a stint as a live-in home stager and moved six times in four years.
The life changes: You were there when I sent each of my children off to college, entering some sort of self-imposed dorm-decorating contest in which I was the sole contestant. You were there through my divorce and remarriage, the loss of two parents and the gain of three grown stepchildren.
The micro and macro: Together, we’ve covered the minor (how to choose drawer knobs and tea towels) and the major (the meaning of home and belonging and how to leave a meaningful legacy.
Thomas Cangemi is stepping down as president and CEO of New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) following the company’s disclosure of internal control deficiencies and a goodwill impairment of $2.4 billion.
Alessandro DiNello, appointed executive chairman of the board on Feb. 6, will replace Cangemi, effective immediately. DiNello was the president and CEO of Flagstar Bancorp, a bank recently acquired by NYCB. The company announced on Thursday that Cangemi, who has been with the company for 27 years, will remain on the board.
Long Island-based NYCB, which concluded the acquisition of Flagstar Bank in December 2022 and rescued Signature Bank in March 2023, has faced a confidence crisis due to its exposure to commercial real estate loans. The stress is leading the bank to seek to sell some of its assets and transfer some mortgage risks to improve its capital position.
Flagstar originated $15.7 billion in mortgages in 2023, according to Inside Mortgage Finance (IMF) estimates. At year’s end, it also had $84.3 billion in owned servicing rights. When including the portfolio of other companies, IMF data shows Flagstar serviced $379 billion in mortgages.
“While we’ve faced recent challenges, we are confident in the direction of our bank and our ability to deliver for our customers, employees, and shareholders in the long term,” DiNello said in a statement. “The changes we’re making to our board and leadership team are reflective of a new chapter that is underway.”
Marshall Lux, who has served as an independent director since 2022, was appointed presiding director of the board, replacing Hanif “Wally” Dahya, who is also stepping down. Lux, a former senior partner at Boston Consulting Group and chief risk officer for Chase Consumer Bank at JPMorgan,will also become chair of the board’s nominating and corporate governance committee.
Changes in the leadership come after NYCB informed on Feb. 23 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that it had completed a goodwill impairment for the fourth quarter of 2023, resulting in a $2.4 billion decrease in the annual net income available to stockholders.
However, the company said the goodwill impairment did not impact regulatory capital ratios or compliance with covenants and did not result in cash expenditures.
The company also stated that the management identified “material weaknesses” in “internal controls related to internal loan review.” It resulted from “ineffective oversight, risk assessment and monitoring activities,” but the company is working on a plan to address the issues.
Credit rating agency Moody’s raised concerns with the company’s governance when it downgraded NYCB to ‘junk status’ in early February. Moody’s mentioned a leadership transition “of second and third lines of defense, the risk and audit functions of the bank, at a pivotal time.”
To address these issues, NYCB announced on Friday the appointment of George Buchanan III as executive vice president and chief risk officer and Colleen McCullum as executive vice president and chief audit executive.
“Over the last three weeks since being appointed as executive chairman, the company has taken swift action to improve all aspects of our operations,” DiNello said in a statement. “The leadership team identified the material weaknesses disclosed yesterday and has been taking the necessary steps to address them, including appointing new executives. Our allowance for credit losses considered these weaknesses and is not expected to change.”
Questions regarding NYCB financials began at the end of January when it reported earnings for fourth-quarter 2023. The data included a $193 million net loss available to common stockholders during the three months and a provision for loan losses of $552 million, up from $62 million in the previous quarter.
Measured by its common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio, the bank’s capitalization fell to 9.1% as of Dec. 31, 2023, down from 9.59% in the third quarter. Targeting a 10% CET1 ratio, the bank cut its quarterly dividend from $0.17 to $0.05 to assist with capital generation.
Less than a year after coming to the rescue of Signature Bankduring the market turmoil of March 2023, New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) faces a confidence crisis due to its exposure to commercial real estate loans.
The stress is leading to the bank to seek the sale of some of its assets to improve its capital position, executives said during a conference call on Wednesday morning. According to a Bloomberg report, the bank has already started to offer its mortgage assets to investors in order to transfer the portfolio risks.
“While we are already in a strong liquidity position, (…) we are committed to building liquidity further,” NYCB executive chairman Alessandro DiNello told analysts during the call.
Bloomberg, citing anonymous sources, reported that NYCB has contacted investors to finance a large portfolio of residential mortgages held by Flagstar Bank. The offering includes a synthetic risk transfer-backed portfolio of about $5 billion in home loans originated when mortgage rates were lower.
According to Inside Mortgage Finance (IMF) estimates, Flagstar originated $15.7 billion in mortgages in 2023. It also had $84.3 billion in owned servicing rights at year’s end. When including the portfolio of other companies, Flagstar serviced $379 billion in mortgages, IMF data shows.
Questions regarding NYCB financials began at the end of January when it reported earnings for fourth-quarter 2023. The data included a $193 million net loss available to common stockholders during the three-month period, compared to a net income of $266 million in the previous quarter.
The performance was impacted “by reserve building repricing risk in multifamily loans and deterioration in office in our ACL [allowance for credit losses] coverage,” the bank said. NYCB’s provisions for loan losses surged to $552 million in Q4 2023, up from $62 million in the previous quarter.
After the earnings report, NYCB stock shrunk 60%, from $10.38 on Jan. 30 to $4.20 on Feb. 6.
Credit rating agency Moody’s put even more pressure on Tuesday when it announced the downgrade to “junk” status of all long-term rates and assessments, as well as some short-term ones, for NYCB and its lead bank, Flagstar.
Moody’s actions reflected, among other things, an unanticipated loss on the bank’s New York office and multifamily property portfolio that “could create potential confidence sensitivity.” It also mentioned the bank’s concentration in rent-regulated multifamily properties amid an inflationary environment, as well as NYCB’s low fixed-rate multifamily loans, which could face refinancing risk.
According to Moody’s, there are also governance risks, including the leadership transition “of second and third lines of defense, the risk and audit functions of the bank, at a pivotal time.”
In response to Moody’s, NYCB president and CEO Thomas R. Cangemi said in a statement that the bank’s deposit ratings remain “investment grade” at other credit rating agencies.
Cangemi also said the bank has an orderly process of bringing in a chief risk officer and a chief audit executive with large bank experience and has “qualified personnel filling those positions on an interim basis.”
NYBC had $83 billion in total deposits as of Tuesday, with 72% of the total insured and collateralized. Total liquidity was $37.3 billion, with a coverage ratio of 163%.
The bank’s capitalization, as measured by its common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratio, fell to 9.1% as of Dec. 31, 2023, down from 9.59% in the third quarter. Targeting a 10% CET1 ratio, the bank announced that it cut its quarterly dividend from $0.17 to $0.05 to assist with capital generation.
“We will build a financial plan to gradually build capital, no ifs, ands or buts,” DiNello told investors. “We have already reduced the dividend to preserve capital, so that’s a step in the right direction. If we must shrink, then we will shrink. If we must sell non-strategic assets, then we’ll do that. We’ll do whatever it takes.”
DiNello said the bank will sell assets, including loans, and will reduce its commercial real estate concentration as soon as it can.
There are plenty of trends that used to be mostly popular among the low-middle income people that changed when they became popular with rich people. Whether it is a band, a clothing style, or a hobby, nothing remains the same once wealth and status get involved. But what are some of the things that poor people loved before they were spoiled by the wealthy? Here, we look at 20 things that once brought joy to those without much money—until their newfound popularity caused them to be re-crafted as symbols of luxury and extravagance.
1. Industrial, Warehouse Apartments
One user shared, “Living in warehouses in the industrial, rundown side of town.”
Another user agreed and commented, “Yes! They tore down all the real lofts to build condos they call lofts.”
2. Etsy
“Etsy,” posted one user.
Another user commented, “There are SO many accounts for cheap stuff from China that you could get on many other websites as well. No, I come to Etsy for homemade stuff and to support artistic individuals.”
One user added, “Yep, I remember trying to avoid the temptation of Shein by almost buying some unique pearl belly dance waist chains from there for 20 dollars. Dear reader, they were from Shein, without the tags and with a hefty 200% price increase. Thank God for the reviewer who exposed them.”
3. Food banks
One Redditor unfolded the riches’ hack and posted, “Food banks. My local food bank put out a news article basically saying that rich people need to stop using the food bank as a ‘life hack’ to lower their grocery bills.”
One user grasped and commented, “OMG. That’s so evil. Some people really have no conscience.”
4. Living in Arty Neighborhoods
One Redditor shared, “Living in arty neighborhoods.”
Another user replied,” This is what I was looking for. Creative poor people have been investing in poor neighbourhoods forever. They use their talent to make it an excellent place they enjoy living in. The rich say, ‘Hey, I want to be cool, let’s buy this.’ And then they price the poor out of the haven they created and turn it into a stale, crowded, overpriced place. TL;DR—Gentrification”
5. Champion Brand Clothes
“Champion brand clothes. I had a lot when I was a kid because it was the cheapest possible, and now all that s- is considered ‘vintage,’” posted one user.
Another responded, “Reminds me of Fila and Puma.”
6. eBay
An online Redditor commented, “Ebay. It used to be so useful to get all kinds of cheap or unique things. Then more and more big commercial sellers joined the club, and eventually, eBay itself forgot about what and who made their platform a success in the first place.”
“I’ve had my eBay account since ’98 when you had to send physical checks/money orders through the mail. It felt like an online flea market or garage sale where you’d get to know certain buyers and sellers. Feedback was critical, and you never bid on something you didn’t plan to buy because any hit to your reputation was a huge deal.
“It was a nice little collecting community until they allowed resellers of knock-off goods in and turned the whole thing into another Amazon. I occasionally still sell collectibles, but the number of people who don’t bother paying is huge now. I miss old eBay,” stated one user.
7. Blue-Collar Residential Neighborhoods
One user also shared, “Blue-collar residential neighborhoods in the city.”
Another user commented, “Yes! This is my answer, too. Not just houses in general but poor neighborhoods, in particular, are being f- over. You can see the tale here in the property history on Realtor.com. Lots and lots of houses were previously on the market for $50,000, bought, and then flipped and listed for $250k to $300k in a ZIP code where the median income is $34.5k, a good $20k less than the median income for the city. Shockingly, no one wants to spend $300k for a s- remodel in the ‘hood, so most of these houses sit empty unless/until they’re put on Airbnb.”
One added, “I think the problem with gentrification in the US is twofold: a failure to provide a path to ownership for often at-risk residents (which leads to slumlords) and a failure to protect the at-risk pop who DO own property from massive tax hikes.
“No one is opposed to tearing down condemned houses and building new ones, but the neighbours who have been there should not get affected by massive tax increases.”
8. Rural Lake Cabins
“Quiet out-of-the-way country cabins sitting by lakes. Now they are overpriced Airbnbs,” posted one user.
Another user commented, “I’d even say Airbnbs themselves. They started as a potentially cheap alternative to hotels run by people with extra space they aren’t doing anything with. Now people build guest houses specifically for Airbnb and treat It like a full-on rental.”
One user suggested, “If you do decide to go to an Airbnb as a getaway, I’d recommend looking for one on a farm. From what I’ve seen, they’re usually run by the farmers as a sort of side gig and not some company or wealthy person.
“The last one I went to was out in the middle of nowhere with like 70 acres that you’re free to explore, and it was actually at an animal rehabilitation center. They rented out their spare room as an Airbnb as a way to bring in more money to put towards the animals. It was insanely cool.
“They had a ton of animals that were being rehabilitated. The living room had a giant window that looked straight into the snow macaque enclosure. It was their inside feeding area, so you could watch them chill and eat like 2 feet away. There was a flock of chickens that would follow you around; most of them were bald or had b-m legs or other issues that would get them slaughtered at a farm. There were storks, peacocks, a very playful otter, spider monkeys, a d-head heron that kept pecking at my boots, boxes, and a lot more, but they even had tigers. Apparently, they were rescued from a carnival and couldn’t be released into the wild. It was so calm and also sweet to know that you were contributing a bit just by staying there.
“Edit: guess I should’ve included it in the original comment. It’s called ‘The Suite at the Ridge’ in Hocking Hills, Ohio. The Airbnb itself wasn’t crazy lovely or anything, but it was perfectly fine, and you’re there to be around the animals anyways. Unfortunately, I can’t post pictures here because I have some I’d love to share.
“Edit 2: I can’t seem to get the listing to show up in a search, only by looking through messages and it says that the host ‘no longer has access to Airbnb’ so I’m not sure what happened. We went in January, so it wasn’t even a year ago. But if you want to look at other sites, the sanctuary is Union Ridge Wildlife Center.
“Edit 3: Don’t Google the name of the wildlife center unless you want my happy post to become a sad post. Turns out it wasn’t as wholesome as I thought it was.”
9. Van Life and Tiny Houses
One online user stated, “Van life and tiny house living.”
Another user replied, “It’s like they gentrified the trailer park.”
Another user commented, “Not where I live. We still have proper trailer parks loaded with meth, pit bulls and domestic violence.”
10. Modernizing a Historic Home
A user commented, “Buying a “fixer-upper” home and spending weekends working on it. I was really looking forward to that.”
One user responded, “I’ve seen so many nice period houses completely gutted on the inside by modern renovations. If I buy a 1930s house, I don’t want a stupid Scandinavian minimalist interior!”
11. Thrift Shopping
“Thrift shopping. I’m not *thrifting* I’m f- broke,” one user commented.
Another user added, “Sometimes I feel like it’s cheaper to buy clothes at Target or Walmart brand new than it is to buy from a thrift store.”
12. Counterculture-Based Festivals
A Redditor stated, “Counterculture-based festivals. Burning Man was on my bucket list until rich folks started showing up with bodyguards and started establishing private zones.”
One user added, “Counterculture as a whole seems to be getting gentrified. In the Netherlands, there are a lot of places you can go to that have a ‘counterculture aesthetic’ or more specifically, ‘squat aesthetic’ but have exorbitant prices. Squatting used to be vast, and multiple venues in the Netherlands (like Paradiso and Melkweg) have their humble beginnings as a squat. Ruigoord, a village close to Amsterdam that got squatted 50 years ago, also completely lost its soul and is filled with yuppies.
“Counterculture is being gentrified, sanitized and sold back to people at exorbitant prices as something ‘new, weird and hip.’”
13. The Farmer’s Market
One user posted, “Going to the farmers market.” A user replied, “I went to a farmer’s market where only one vendor sold fruits and vegetables. There were three boutique honey stands and an old white lady selling ‘native’ art. St Philips Plaza in Tucson, for anyone who knows what I’m talking about. So dumb.”
14. Houses
“Houses. We poor people would work our entire lives to own one. Property became a great investment and a way to increase wealth, so rich people bought them. Not to live in as intended but to rent to the poor and keep them poor by renting so they will never be able to save enough to afford their own.” a user added to the thread.
15. Fajitas
One Redditor shared, “Fajitas. I remember being able to get skirt steak really cheap and sometimes for free.”
One user replied, “That goes for any ‘cheap’ cut of meat.”
16. Pickup Trucks
“Pickup trucks. They used to be much cheaper,” one user posted.
Another user replied, “They’re luxury minivans now.”
17. Unrestricted Land
One user posted, “Unrestricted land. Everything gets an HOA now, and they try to force you into their jurisdiction.
“My family fought an HOA targeting my grandmother’s house. She had lived there for ten years before the HOA was even an idea, or the new area with big houses was cleared for construction before that.
“We ended up having Rock in her house, skirting, and rock under her deck due to insufficient money to fight an HOA she never signed on to.
“If an HOA comes out where I live (which might happen in the next 15 years), I will fight them tooth and nail for spite alone.”
18. Cheat Cuts of Meat
“Off cuts of meat,” shared one user.
Another user replied, “I remember when chicken wings were 10 cents because they could not give them away. Now, they are an industry. They break a wing in half and call it two wings.”
19. Concerts and Festivals
One user shared, “Concerts and festivals.”
Another Redditor added, “I agree with this one. I have lost all interest in the concert/festival experience.”
20. Brisket Burnt Ends
“Brisket burnt ends. BBQ joints used to toss them or give them away for free,” One commenter added.
Another user replied, “BBQ used to be poor people’s food. Nobody wanted to eat ribs and brisket because they are hard to cook. Now every upper-middle-class person has a smoker, and BBQ costs an arm and a leg.”
Do you agree with the things listed above? Share your thoughts below!
Source: Reddit.
Who is one actress you can never stand watching, no matter their role? After polling the internet, these were the top-voted actresses that people couldn’t stand watching.
10 Actresses People Despise Watching Regardless of Their Role
These 7 Celebrities are Genuinely Good People
We’ve all heard the famous adage that “no publicity is bad publicity,” and while it tends to be accurate, there are certainly exceptions. But what about those few stars who stay out of the limelight and get along without a hint of trouble?
These 7 Celebrities are Genuinely Good People
These 10 Activities Are an Immediate Red Flag
Have you ever known someone and thought you liked them—until you learned about their hobbies? Then you get to know them and then you’re like, “Wow, red flag.” Well, you’re not alone.
These 10 Activities Are an Immediate Red Flag
Some celebrities definitely seem to enjoy the limelight and keep working to stay in the public eye. While others quickly move out of the spotlight. Many of these actors and actresses stepped out of the spotlight to live a more private life without constant media pressures.
10 Celebrities That Made the Big Times Then Disappeared Off The Face of the Earth
We’ve all been there – sitting through a movie that we can’t help but cringe at, but somehow it still manages to hold a special place in our hearts.
These 10 Terrible Movies Are Still People’s Favorites
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is sounding the alarm about an accelerating rate of scams that most commonly target older Americans, where a bad actor will pose as an official representative of the Bureau or another federal agency.
The CFPB published a blog post on Tuesday describing details of the scam, including the lengths that the bad actors will go to convince their targets of the deception.
“This week, we confirmed that scammers are using CFPB employees’ names to try to defraud members of the public,” the blog post said. “We’ve heard from people, specifically older adults, who received phone or video calls.”
The Bureau, the post said, will never solicit personal information or money from members of the American public.
“This includes never asking you to pay an upfront fee or taxes, or telling you that you’ve won a lottery, sweepstakes, or class-action lawsuit,” the post said. “We also won’t ask you for personal or sensitive information before you can cash a check we’ve issued.”
The Bureau outlined three common variations of the scam, including an imposter posing as a government or Bureau official in a phone or video call; calls or messages informing the scam target of a class action lawsuit that could award them money, or some other kind of unexpected direct cash payment; and being told that to collect money, the target must first “pay taxes or another upfront fee to collect the money.”
Scammers will persistently seek to find “reasons” for the target to pay more money to them in “fees or taxes,” but it “is all part of the scam,” the Bureau said.
For anyone contacted by someone claiming to be a CFPB or government official, consumers are directed to reach out to the Bureau’s consumer call center. It can be reached at (855) 411-2372 and operates from 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday. That center can assist a caller with verifying the authenticity of government communication.
“Scammers could reach out to you by phone, mail, email, text message/SMS, social media, messaging apps, or through other online channels,” the CFPB advised. “Scams can also occur in person, at home, or at a business.”
Older Americans are commonly the targets of scammers, as noted by prior CFPB research and public advisory notices. Because of the demographics and involvement in financial services, some scammers have also chosen to falsely identify themselves as members of the reverse mortgage industry.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Office of the Inspector General has previously warned the public about such scammers, saying that reverse mortgage product complexity could allow certain scammers to sew confusion among their targets and make them vulnerable to bad actors.
Negative marks can stay on your credit report for seven or even 10 years. But if you are having trouble managing your finances, don’t panic.
Many people hit a moment at some point when they miss a payment or pay bills late. Or perhaps they face mounting credit card debt or the prospect of foreclosure. If you are grappling with any of these situations, you may wonder how long your credit report will reflect these issues.
While seven years is a typical time period for events to stay on your report and potentially impact your credit score, the time period could be considerably shorter. And as time passes, the effect of these “bad marks” will typically diminish.
Read on to learn more about what can lower your credit score, how long it can take to bounce back, and ways to manage your money responsibly, which can help build your score.
Factors that Can Influence Your Credit Score & Report
A credit score gives a numerical value to a person’s credit history. It can help give lenders a big-picture look at a potential borrower’s creditworthiness. These scores (there isn’t just one) give lenders insight into how reliable a person might be when it comes to repaying their debt.
This can influence a lender’s decision on whether or not to loan a person money, how much money they are willing to lend, and the rates and terms for which a borrower qualifies.
Since credit scores are so widely used, it’s easy to see why some individuals may be interested in improving their credit scores. First, it might be helpful to understand the factors used to actually determine your score. Here’s a snapshot of what goes into a FICO® Score, since that is the credit score used by many lenders right now.
• Your payment history accounts for approximately 35% of your FICO Score, making it one of the most influential factors. Even just one missed or late payment could potentially lower a person’s credit score.
• Credit utilization ratio accounts for 30% of your score. Credit utilization ratio is your total revolving debt in comparison to your total available revolving credit limit. A low credit utilization ratio can indicate to lenders that you are effectively managing your credit. Typically, lenders like to see a credit utilization ratio that is less than 30%.
• The length of your credit history counts for 15%, and that may be a good reason not to close an account that you use infrequently. It might help add to the length of your history.
• Your credit mix accounts for 10% of your score. While not a good reason to go out and open a new line of credit, the bureaus do tend to prefer to see a mix of accounts vs. just one kind of credit.
• The last component, also at 10%, is new credit, meaning are you currently making a lot of requests for credit. The number of hard credit inquiries in your name could make it look as if you are at risk of financial instability and are seeking ways to pay for goods and services.
💡 Quick Tip: Some personal loan lenders can release your funds as quickly as the same day your loan is approved.
[embedded content]
Credit Issues: How Long Do They Linger?
Negative factors like late payments and foreclosures can hang around on your credit report for a while. Generally, the information is included for around seven years.
Bankruptcy is an exception to this seven year guideline—it can linger on your credit report for up to 10 years, depending on the type of bankruptcy filed. Bankruptcies filed under Chapter 7 can be reported for up to 10 years from the filing date. Bankruptcies filed under Chapter 13 can be reported for seven.
While a late payment will be listed on a credit report for seven years, as time passes it typically has less of an impact. So if you missed a payment last month, it will have more of an effect on your score than if you missed a payment four years ago.
These numbers are important to know when you are working to build your credit.
How Long Does It Take For Your Credit Score to Go Up?
Here’s a look, in chart form, at how long it takes for different negative factors to drop off your credit report.
Factor
Typical credit score recovery time
Bankruptcy
7-10 years
Late payment
Up to 7 years
Home foreclosure
Up to 7 years
Closing a credit card account
3 months or longer
Maxing out a credit card account
3 months or longer, depending on how quickly you repay your debt
Applying for a new credit card
3 months typically
Disputing an Error on Your Credit Report
Checking your credit report can help you stay on top of your credit. You’ll also be able to make sure the information is correct, and if needed, dispute any mistakes. There could, for instance, be a bill you paid long ago on your report as unpaid, or perhaps account details belonging to someone else with a similar name erroneously wound up on your report.
There are three major credit bureaus — Equifax®, Experian®, and TransUnion®. Once a year you can request a copy of your credit report from each of the three credit bureaus, at no cost. You can visit AnnualCreditReport.com to learn more. Checking in with each report may feel a little repetitive, but it’s possible that the credit bureaus could have slightly different information on file.
If you find that there are discrepancies or errors, you can dispute the mistake. You’ll have to write to each credit bureau individually. Generally, you’ll need to send in documentation to support your claim. Once you’ve submitted your dispute letter, the bureaus typically have 30 days to respond.
It’s possible that a bureau will require additional supporting documentation, which can lead to some back and forth within or sometimes after the 30 days. It could take anywhere from three to six months to resolve a credit dispute, though some of these situations will take more or less time depending on complexity.
Staying on Top of Efforts to Build Credit
Sometimes, resolving issues on a credit report isn’t enough to build a bad credit score. On the bright side, credit scores aren’t permanent. Here are a few ideas for helping you to build your credit.
Improve Account Management
If you’re struggling to keep up with accounts with a variety of financial institutions, it could be time to simplify. Take stock of your investments, debts, credit cards, and savings or checking accounts. Is there any opportunity to consolidate?
Having your accounts in one, easy-to-check location can make it simpler to ensure you never miss an alert or important deadline. Automating your finances and using your bank’s app to regularly check in with your accounts (say, a few times a week can be a good cadence) can make good money sense as well, helping you keep on top of payment deadlines and when your balance might be getting low. 💡 Quick Tip: Swap high-interest debt for a lower-interest loan, and save money on your monthly payments. Find out why credit card consolidation loans are so popular.
Make Payments On-Time
Did you know that your payment history (as in, do you pay on time) is the single largest factor in determining your credit score? Lenders can be hesitant to lend money to people with a history of late payments. So make sure you’re aware of each bill’s due date and make your payments on time. One idea? As mentioned above, you could set up autopay so you don’t even have to think about it.
Limit Credit Utilization Ratio
It could help to set a realistic budget that leads to a fair credit utilization ratio, meaning that your credit balances aren’t too high in relation to your credit limit. Some accounts will let you set up balance alerts that can warn you as you inch closer to the 30% guideline of the maximum you want to reach. Another option could be paying your credit card bill more frequently (for example, setting up a mid-cycle payment in addition to your regular payment).
Stratege to Destroy Debt
When it comes to paying off debt, having a plan can help. For example, using a credit card can be an effective way to build your credit history, but if not used responsibly, credit card debt can be incredibly difficult to pay off.
Not only that, it could end up impacting your credit score (say, if your credit utilization ratio creeps up above 30%, as noted above). As a part of your plan to build your credit after negative factors have occurred, you might consider putting a debt repayment plan into place.
Your finances and personal situation will be a major factor in the debt payoff plan that works best for you. If you need some inspiration, the methods below may be helpful to reference in your quest to pay off debt. If you decide that one of these options works for you, here’s how you might go about them.
The Snowball
The snowball method of paying off debt is pretty straightforward.
• To put it into action, you would organize your debts from smallest to largest, without factoring in the interest rates.
• Then you’d continue to make the minimum payments on all of your debts while paying as much as possible on your smallest debt.
• When the smallest debt is paid off, you’d then roll that money into debt payments for the next smallest debt — until all of your debt is repaid.
This strategy is all about changing behavior and building in incentives to help keep you going. Starting with the smallest debt means you’d see the reward of paying it off faster than if you had started with the larger debt. While this method can help keep you motivated and laser-focused on eliminating your debt, it isn’t always the most cost effective, since it doesn’t take into account interest rates.
The Avalanche
The debt avalanche method encourages you to focus on your highest-interest debts first.
• Prioritize debts with the highest interest rates by putting any extra cash towards them.
• Continue to make the minimum payments on all of your other debts.
This technique could help save money in interest in the long run. And it could even help you pay off your debts sooner than the snowball method.
The Fireball
The fireball method combines the snowball and avalanche methods in a hybrid approach designed to help you blaze through costly debt so you can focus on the things that matter most to you.
• The first step in this method is to go through all of your debts and categorize them as either “good” or “bad.”
• “Good” debts are those that tend to contribute to your financial growth and net worth; they also tend to have relatively lower interest rates. Good debt might be a student loan that helps you launch your career or a mortgage that allows you to own a home.
• Debts with high interest rates that don’t go towards building wealth (such as credit card debt) are often considered “bad.” With this method, you can list your “bad” debts from the smallest amount to the largest amount.
• Then you’d take a look at your budget and see how much money you have to funnel toward making extra debt payments. While making the minimum monthly payment on all outstanding debts, you’d direct the extra funds toward the bad debt with the smallest amount due.
• When that smallest balance is repaid in full, you’d apply the total amount you were paying on that debt to the next smallest debt. Then you’d continue this pattern, moving through each outstanding bad debt until they are all paid in full.
An important note: While you are moving through your higher-interest debts, you would still follow the normal payment schedule on your lower-interest debts.
By focusing on the debts with the highest interest rates first, this method could save you some change when compared with the snowball method. And, since you’re then targeting bad debt from the smallest balance to the largest, you could still benefit from the same psychological boost as you see your debt shrink, one payment at a time.
Create a Goals-Based Approach
Having financial goals could possibly help you streamline your efforts. If you’re actively working toward saving for, say, a down payment, you may feel less inclined to spend money elsewhere.
You could try setting short-term, mid-term, and long-term goals. In the short-term your goals might be as simple as tracking your spending and setting up a budget. Or perhaps saving for a big vacation that’s a year or so away. For mid-term goals, you might think about something a little further out, like buying a house or saving for a child’s education. Long-term goals are often things like (you guessed it) saving for retirement.
Writing down your goals and setting a time for when you’d like to reach them can help you set up your plan.
Consolidate Your Debt
If you are working on building your credit and want to pay down your credit card balances, one option could be a personal loan to consolidate that high-interest debt.
Think twice before turning to high-interest credit cards. Consider a SoFi personal loan instead. SoFi offers competitive fixed rates and same-day funding. Checking your rate takes just a minute.
SoFi’s Personal Loan was named NerdWallet’s 2023 winner for Best Online Personal Loan overall.
SoFi Loan Products SoFi loans are originated by SoFi Bank, N.A., NMLS #696891 (Member FDIC). For additional product-specific legal and licensing information, see SoFi.com/legal. Equal Housing Lender.
Disclaimer: Many factors affect your credit scores and the interest rates you may receive. SoFi is not a Credit Repair Organization as defined under federal or state law, including the Credit Repair Organizations Act. SoFi does not provide “credit repair” services or advice or assistance regarding “rebuilding” or “improving” your credit record, credit history, or credit rating. For details, see the FTC’s website .
Non affiliation: SoFi isn’t affiliated with any of the companies highlighted in this article.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
Third-Party Brand Mentions: No brands, products, or companies mentioned are affiliated with SoFi, nor do they endorse or sponsor this article. Third-party trademarks referenced herein are property of their respective owners.