The agencies intend to tackle two challenges evident during the Covid-years refi boom: higher costs due to appraiser shortages and concerns regarding bias in home valuations.
In their letter, MBA and CBA said that AVMs and technologies like them can alleviate appraiser shortages, reduce transaction costs, and safeguard against individual appraisal bias. Ultimately, a robust regulatory framework continues to be a critical imperative to achieve these outcomes.
However, any regulation should consider the practicalities of model risk management and its potential unintended consequences.
For example, the associations said the proposed rule includes Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the new standards, which creates a level playing field in the market. But the trade groups are worried about the impact of quality control standards on the GSEs’ alternative valuation methods, such as desktop appraisal, since these tools are essential in times of high demand.
“MBA and CBA suggest that the agencies consult with the GSEs to ensure that application of the quality control standards would not create adverse effects on the availability of alternative valuation methods,” the letter states.
In addition, regulators should be aware of any unbalanced market effects of AVMs regulations, conflicting interpretations of the legal framework, and the lack of established methodologies in examining systemic bias in the U.S., the trade groups state.
The agencies involved include the Federal Housing Finance Agency; the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; the National Credit Union Administration; the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; the U.S. Department of the Treasury; and the Federal Reserve System.
Per the proposed rules, each institution using AVMs will adopt and maintain its practices, procedures, and control systems, reducing the burden on smaller institutions. But the trade groups request the agencies to include a small lender/servicer exemption from the standards, as these companies are likely to rely on larger outside service providers subject to a thorough review by regulators or larger clients.
Regarding third-party providers, the associations suggest that the CFPB expand its Compliance Bulletin 2016-02, Service Providers to outline expectations and potential recourse “for quality control and fair lending oversight” of third-parties providing AVMs services. In addition, MBA and CBA said that creditors should not be liable for violating nondiscrimination law when relying on third-party AVMs, disagreeing with the agencies’ interpretation of the Fair Housing Act.
The MBA and the CBA requested an adequate implementation timeline of at least 12 months.
The White House supports a new rule for AVMs, which follows goals set out by the president in addressing issues of racial bias that have exacerbated homeownership and wealth gaps. When announcing the proposed rule, Vice President Kamala Harris weighed in.
“Today, I’m proud to announce we are developing a rule that will require that financial institutions ensure that their appraisal algorithms are not biased, for example, that they do not produce lower valuations for homes owned by people of color,” Harris said. “We are also releasing the guidance to make it easier for consumers to appeal what they suspect to be unbiased valuation.”
Another trade group weighed in on the newly proposed rule.
The National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB) said it supports new federal regulatory proposals governing the use of AVMs.
“The reality is the systems and structures are themselves, in some cases, problematic,” said NAMB President Ernest Jones in a statement. “Even when appraisers follow the intended approach, it may result in an outcome that disenfranchises people. They could be doing everything in a way they feel is consistent with the approaches they’ve learned and for which they’re certified, but there are some underlying issues that need to be addressed.”
With the mortgage industry still rightsizing, mortgage professionals are worried about regulation of the industry and inflation that thins already tiny margins. Industry players are largely pessimistic about the economic climate and expect interest rates to trend up in the near term future, according to the HousingWire Q2 2023 LenderPulse survey.
Roughly 30% of 155 respondents of the LenderPulse survey pointed to increased regulation, rising interest rates and inflation as the biggest challenge they face in the next three months, out of a total of 11 options that included lender stability, underwriting problems and competitiveness of product offerings.
About 19.4% of the surveyed mortgage professionals said loans falling through was the biggest challenge, ranking as the second most challenging factor. Lead generation ranked as the third biggest hurdle at 15.5% and staying motivated trailed at the fourth place at 14.2%.
Other challenges selected by mortgage professionals were relationships with real estate agents at 8.4%; competitiveness of rate sheet and underwriting problems at 5.8%; lender stability at 3.9%; competitiveness of product offerings at 1.9%. None of the surveyed mortgage professionals said staff cuts caused decreased ability to close loans and lack of training were the challenges they faced.
LenderPulse requests surveys from 24,000 mortgage professionals across the country on market trends and lender opportunities and challenges. Of the 155 completed surveys, 32.3% of the respondents were from the Southwest, 21.3% from the Midwest, 16.8% from the Northeast, and 14.8% of the respondents from the Northwest and Southeast. RealTrends LenderPulse is a forward-looking quarterly survey. The survey was conducted from February 27 to April 3.
Economic and Housing Market Outlook
Amid theFederal Reserve‘s efforts to tame inflation, 44.5% of surveyed mortgage professionals expressed pessimism about the economy in the next three months. Of the total, 36.1% were neutral and 19.4% were optimistic.
Mortgage professionals’ pessimism about the economy in the near term stemmed from expectations of interest rates trending higher.
About 47.1% of the respondents said rates will likely go up in the next three months, 30.1% of the survey participants said rates will remain flat while 22% said rates will trend down.
A total of 45% of participants said home sales in their markets will remain flat for the next three months; 30.3% said sales will go up more than 5%; and 25.2% expected sales to go down more than 5%
In the latest report from the National Association of Realtors (NAR), existing home sales rose 14.5% in February month over month for the first time after 12 months of decline.
Incentives in the Market
In a higher-rate environment, temporary rate buydowns funded by sellers, lenders or builders were widely offered as an incentive for buyers.
The majority of the 155 respondents – about 70% of the total – noted temporary rate buydowns funded by the seller, builder or lender are offered as incentives to buyers.
“Sellers are entertaining offers with rate buydowns and concessions to keep this market going but also to sell their property,” a loan originator in California said.
In a high-rate environment, lenders call the temporary rate buydown a win-win strategy for both sellers and buyers when used appropriately.
For example, a 2-1 buydown can be paid for by the homebuyer or the home seller can pay for it as a seller concession. That payment can be made in the form of mortgage points or a lump sum deposited in an escrow account with the lender and used to subsidize the borrower’s reduced monthly payments.
“As it pertains to buydowns and or seller funded buydowns, in my opinion and from my perspective I feel this product is really only viable and something that makes sense for a borrower if the buydown is seller or builder funded,” an operations manager based in California said. “It is essentially free money that would be credited back to the borrower should they pay the loan off within the buy down structure (1/0, 2/1, or 3/2/1).”
Seller credit for closing costs, price reductions waiving of fees, and adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) were also mentioned by mortgage professionals as incentives offered in the market.
“The 2/1 buydowns were working great, but now the market has tightened with a lack of supply of homes on the market, so a lot of the sellers quit offering this or accepting this,” a mortgage broker in Arizona said.
“Borrowers opt for ARMs more often than a fixed rate for a more competitive rate. Many are curious about buydowns but we are currently operating in what is still a seller’s market so not seeing many seller-funded buydowns,” a loan officer in Boston noted.
Pivot to a purchase mortgage market
In a purchase mortgage-focused market, getting referrals from real estate agents is key to landing business.
Keeping in contact with Realtors periodically, forming new relationships at open houses and setting up in-person meetings were how mortgage professionals strengthened relationships with realtors, according to the submitted written responses.
“Volunteering with our local Board of Realtors, on three (3) committees; Education, Banking & Finance and Membership Engagement. Looking to form relationships that I can turn into referrals down the road once they realize how organized I am, how smart I am and that I am a relationship lender in a local community bank!” a loan officer in Washington noted.
Sharing leads and sending out newsletters are ways loan officers try to get themselves to stand out in a highly competitive industry.
“Actively engaging with them, monthly lending newsletter, training opportunities [is how we strengthen relationships with Realtors],” an executive at a regional bank in Michigan said in a written response.
“Our goal is to strengthen our Realtor partners relative to their competitors. To do this, we’re holding skills and knowledge classes and meeting face to face to share best practices,” a loan officer located in Texas said.
If you have questions about LendingPulse email RealTrends Editorial Director Tracey Velt at [email protected]. Also, be sure to sign up for the new Data Digest newsletter, a weekly breakdown of news, tips and strategies for success.
The average U.S. mortgage rate for a 30-year fixed loan fell to 2.8% this week, another record low, Freddie Mac said in a report on Thursday. The rate fell one basis points from the week prior and is now six basis points lower than the original all-time low set in mid-September.
The average fixed rate for a 15-year mortgage was 2.33%, falling from last week’s 2.35%.
After this week’s dip, there have now been 13 consecutive weeks when average mortgage rates have been below 3%, and rates have broken records 11 times this year.
“Mortgage rates remain very low, providing homeowners who have not already taken advantage of this environment ample opportunity to do so,” said Sam Khater, Freddie Mac’s chief economist. “Mortgage rates today are on average more than a full percentage point lower than rates over the last five years.”
In March, in an effort to buffer the economic blows from the shutdown, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell announced the Fed would start buying bonds to prevent a credit crunch and make borrowing cheaper. According to Fed data, the central bank has bought over $1 trillion in bonds backed by home loans since then.
While purchase loans are seeing record-low rates, the adverse market fee imposed on refinance loans by the FHFA in August make record lows for those loans unlikely.
During this week’s Mortgage Bankers Association annual event, the heads of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac discussed the adverse market fee.
“As you know, safety and soundness is one, two, and three for us,” said Fannie Mae CEO Hugh Frater. “And for us to play our role in all markets, good and bad, markets small and large, we have to do it safely and soundly with long-term risk management in mind. And that’s the rationale for this change, as the GSEs are shouldering significant risks associated with the pandemic — as the principal risk taker, we have to price that risk appropriately.”
He added that while the housing market has demonstrated real resiliency, “many millions of borrowers are under stress, there’s still significant risk caused by economic uncertainty both in the near term and the longer term. And we’re required by law and regulation to be compensated for these risks and these costs.”
Freddie Mac CEO David Brickman struck a similar tone, saying that the GSEs have provided “extraordinary support” to the market.
“Costs have changed, risks have changed. What we put in place is an appropriate and prudent response to that change in the external environment for us to support struggling homeowners.”
They both noted that with interest rates still low, borrowers will realize savings, even with the 50 basis point refinance fee factored in. “But obviously, anybody who’s refinancing their mortgage at a lower rate is already beginning to save in terms of their mortgage payments, this only means they save just a little bit less than they would have otherwise,” said Brickman.
The ruling, effective August 1, phases out incandescent bulbs in favor of efficient LEDs.
Fast facts:
Homeowners can still use existing incandescents, but can no longer purchase replacements (with a few exceptions) and should start switching to LEDs.
Switching to efficient light bulbs is estimated to cut US emissions by 222 million metric tons and save consumers around $3 billion over 30 years ($100 every month per home).
Retailers have already been pulling inefficient bulbs off shelves for over a year in preparation, so consumers won’t notice a large shift.
What happened?
In April 2022, the Department of Energy (DOE) passed a new rule requiring all new light bulbs to emit at least 45 lumens per watt(with a few exceptions), essentially phasing out incandescents. The rule went into effect on August 1, 2023, but has been in the works since 2007. The European Union passed a similar law in 2012.
Because most light bulbs other than LEDs (Light Emitting Diodes) don’t meet these standards, this rule bans all inefficient light bulbs, including incandescents. Businesses can no longer sell inefficient bulbs after August 1, and manufacturers haven’t been allowed to produce inefficient bulbs since January 1, 2023.
Consumers likely won’t see a difference in product selection, however; most retailers have been taking inefficient bulbs off of shelves for a year in anticipation of this ruling.
Why did the government ban incandescent light bulbs?
DOE passed this ruling to help reduce the country’s carbon emissions. Importantly, this isn’t an outright ban on incandescent lights, and some specific ones are exempt, such as those in vehicles, appliances, traffic signals, and emergency lighting. However, all other new incandescents (including halogen lights) will become illegal to sell and purchase if they don’t meet the new efficiency standards. Many compact fluorescent lights technically meet the new standards, but will also be outlawed soon.
Joel Worthington, President of Mr. Electric, a Neighborly company, notes that the government is phasing out incandescent light bulbs because they are very inefficient. “They only convert about 10% of the energy they use into light,” he says. “The rest of the energy is wasted as heat.” In addition to being inefficient, incandescent light bulbs also have a relatively short lifespan; most only last about 1,000 hours.
By contrast, LED light bulbs usually last well over 10 years (with a few outliers). They’re also extremely efficient, converting up to 90% of the energy they use into light. This efficiency helps dramatically reduce waste, cut carbon emissions, and lower consumers’ utility bills. ENERGY STAR rated LEDs provide the most efficiency.
Can you still buy incandescent light bulbs?
Starting August 1, 2023, lightbulbs that don’t meet the efficiency requirements are illegal to sell and purchase(except for a few specialty bulbs). This means it will be very difficult to find new incandescent and halogen light bulbs.
You don’t have to destroy your inefficient light bulbs, though. “As your incandescent light bulbs go out, you can replace them with energy-efficient bulbs,” notes Joel Worthington. If you have a backstock at home, you can continue installing and using them until you run out.
What the incandescent ban means for homeowners
Transitioning from incandescents to LEDs is good for everyone. It helps save you money, lower your carbon footprint, and reduce unnecessary waste. In fact, nearly half of US households already primarily use LEDs.
The new ruling doesn’t mean you have to test and get rid of your inefficient light bulbs immediately. “It simply means that when they burn out and when your supply runs out, you will have to find a more efficient replacement, most likely an LED,” says Joel Worthington. And because LEDs last up to 30 times longer than incandescent lighting, you won’t have to replace them nearly as often.
This decision matters most for those with lower incomes, who generally spend a larger percentage of their income on utility bills. Incandescent lights are cheap but inefficient, and are often the only option in budget stores. This leads to higher electric bills.
Luckily, LEDs have been dropping in price for years. And with new rules, they will likely decrease even more. making them more accessible and helping reduce electricity costs for everyone.
How will switching to LEDs affect your home?
If you primarily use incandescent light bulbs, you may be worried about how switching to LEDs will affect your home’s aesthetic. Luckily, Joel has some good news: “The regulation exempts a few specific incandescent bulbs that you may have around your home, such as chandelier bulbs, grow lights (for gardening), and holiday lights,” he says. “Yes, your holiday lighting is safe.”
For the large majority of bulbs, though, you will have to switch to an efficient option when your current bulbs go out, most likely LEDs.
Some people prefer incandescent lighting because of the quality of light it produces. However, LEDs actually offer a much wider range of color temperatures than most other bulbs, and are highly flexible, with dimmable, multicolored, string, or strip options available.
What happens next?
The incandescent light bulb ban is just one step in a larger effort to make lighting even more energy-efficient. The DOE recently proposed significantly higher efficiency standards, pushing the requirement to 120 lumens per watt. This would essentially phase out every option except LEDs, including fluorescents.
The DOE is also considering new efficiency standards for other types of appliances, such as refrigerators, dishwashers, and washing machines. These standards are designed to help consumers save energy and money, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
It’s important to note that the DOE is not the only organization that is working on energy efficiency standards. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also sets energy efficiency standards for appliances, such as through the ENERGY STAR program. In addition, many states and local governments have their own energy efficiency standards.
The future of energy efficiency standards is uncertain, but it’s clear that the trend is towards more stringent standards.
This article originally appeared on Spark Rental and has been republished here with permission.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author only and are not endorsed by Credit.com.
What Is the Purpose of Bonds in Your Portfolio?
Bonds have historically served as a counterweight to stocks, as investors approach retirement.
For all their advantages, stocks come with one enormous disadvantage: volatility. When you first retire, you face something called sequence risk: the risk of a stock market crash early in your retirement, before your stock portfolio has compounded enough to withstand a deep drop.
Here’s how bonds protect you from sequence risk, and the role they play in your retirement portfolio.
1. Low Risk
Bonds are interest-only debts. When you buy a bond, the issuer (the borrower) agrees to pay you interest at a set rate for a certain period of time. At the end of that period, the bond matures and you get your principal investment back.
Bonds come with two risks. First, and most relevantly to retirees, the bond issuer could default. That rarely happens, at least outside of the junk bond market. The other risk is that interest rates rise, so the value of your existing bonds goes down on the secondary market. But this risk doesn’t really apply to retirees simply looking for ongoing interest income rather than looking to trade bonds.
The low risk of bond default counterbalances the real risk of stock market corrections and crashes. Retirees can lean on their bond income if the stock market crashes, and (hopefully) avoid selling while stock prices are low.
2. Low Correlation with Stocks
Bonds provide diversification for investors. Bond returns have a low correlation with stock returns: they rarely crash at the same time as stock markets. In fact, bond prices normally rise when stocks crash, as investors flee stocks for the safety of bonds.
Once again, this protects retirees from the risk of a stock market crash.
3. Stable Income
Retirees need passive income to live on, in the absence of a paycheck. Interest payments from bonds can provide that steady income.
The same can’t be said for stocks. Not all stocks pay dividends, and even those that do can change their dividend payment at any time. They could lower or eliminate their dividend entirely, leaving retirees without income. The retiree could sell their stocks to generate income of course, but that reduces their net worth.
Can Real Estate Fill the Role of Bonds in Your Portfolio?
The short answer: yes, if you know what you’re doing. Which, of course, not everyone does.
Real estate investments can earn you ongoing income, with low risk and low correlation to the stock market. So they can serve the same purpose as bonds in your retirement portfolio, at a higher return. In fact, one study reviewing all asset classes for the last 145 years found that rental properties offered higher returns than stocks, with far lower risk.
Still, some types of real estate investments require work on your part. You could invest in publicly-traded REITs, bought and sold on stock exchanges and just as passive as stocks, but they tend to share a high correlation with stock markets. That gives them little diversification value.
But there are many types of real estate investments, each with their own pros and cons. Real estate will never be completely risk-free like Treasury bonds, but it can offer strong returns at low risk, especially if you diversify.
Ways to Invest in Real Estate as a Bond Alternative
The permanent environment of low interest rates in the 21st century have made bonds unappealing and real estate far more appealing. Investors can use leverage to buy real estate with other people’s money, at low interest.
Or not–many of the real estate investing options below don’t involve leverage at all.
Consider the following ways to invest in real estate as options to replace bonds in your investment portfolio.
1. Crowdfunded Private REITs
Publicly-traded REITs come with several downsides, beyond high correlation with stock markets. They’re volatile, with prices bouncing up and down similarly to stocks. But they’re also required by the SEC to distribute at least 90% of their profits each to shareholders, in the form of dividends. That gives them high dividend yields, but it also makes it hard for REITs to invest money in new properties to grow their share price.
Private, crowdfunded REITs such as Fundrise, Streitwise, and Diversyfund don’t have the same restriction. They can grow the value of their fund share prices by reinvesting profits into new properties.
Even so, many do still offer high dividend yields that rival or even beat public REITs. Fundrise pays dividend yields in the 4-7% range, while Streitwise pays dividends in the 8-9% range.
Crowdfunded REITs represent one of the easiest and most passive ways to invest in real estate. No mailings or labor to find good deals on properties, no tenant screening or rent collection hassles, just buy shares and sit back.
2. Crowdfunded Investment Property Loans
Hard money lenders issue short-term loans to investors who fix and flip properties, or refinance them after renovating them (the BRRRR method). But where do hard money lenders get their funds to lend?
From you, in some cases. For example, GroundFloor lends short-term investment property loans for buying and renovating, and they raise the money from retail investors.
You get to pick and choose which loans you want to fund, and you can lend as little as $10 per loan. Which means anyone with $10 in their pocket can invest in real estate, at least indirectly through property-secured loans.
If the borrower defaults, the lender forecloses, and you get your money back that way. Since hard money lenders fund at a relatively low LTV, that provides strong protection against default. Read: relatively low risk.
Related Read: Thinking of Getting into Retail Investing? Here Are 7 Things to Consider
3. Rental Properties
You can also buy rental properties, of course.
Direct real estate investing comes with plenty of advantages. You can leverage other people’s money by using an investment property loan to fund 75-80% of the cost. Investors get spectacular tax benefits, from rental property tax deductions to property depreciation. And rental income in retirement doesn’t expire or diminish — quite the opposite. Rental cash flow rises over time, as rents rise and provide a hedge against inflation.
Is rental income good for retirement? Absolutely, but it does come with a few caveats. As noted above, buying and managing rental properties takes work. Even if you hire a property manager, you still have to manage the manager.
Rental income is predictable as a long-term average, so you can forecast returns with a rental income calculator. But net rental cash flow each month varies wildly, as you experience vacancies, turnover, or repairs. That means retirees need to budget accordingly with an emergency fund, and not depend on a steady paycheck from every property, every month.
4. House Hacking
Want free housing? Explore options for house hacking, or finding ways for other people to cover your housing expenses.
The traditional model involved multifamily house hacking: typically buying a duplex or triplex, moving into one unit, and renting out the neighboring unit(s). The rents from your neighbors cover your mortgage payment and ideally your maintenance costs as well.
But that’s not the only way to house hack. You can also bring in housemates, or rent rooms or units on Airbnb, or rent out storage space on Neighbor.com.
By eliminating–or at least greatly reducing–your housing payment, you don’t require nearly as much passive income from your investments to live on in retirement.
5. Private Notes
A “note” is the legal document that you sign when you borrow money. For example, when you took out your last mortgage, the most important document you signed was the promissory note.
You can lend money privately to other real estate investors, having them sign a private note. You set the terms of the loan, including the interest rate, any fees, loan term, and any other factors.
Beware, however, that lending money to other investors largely comes down to trust. Unless you file a lien against their property, you have little recourse if they default on you. Only lend money to experienced investors you know well and trust implicitly to pay you back.
Get it right, and you can earn high returns completely passively.
6. Land Notes
There’s a lot to love about land investing.
To begin with, land offers low risk and high returns. It also doesn’t necessarily require much cash to invest. Best of all, you don’t have to hassle with contractors or tenants, which means low stress and far fewer complications. No repairs or renovations, no chasing tenants for rent collection, no property damage by uncaring renters.
For all that, land investing requires you to approach it like a business. You can eventually automate that business to run in the background with only an hour or so required each week from you, but it takes time and labor to get to that point. Many retirees (and employees for that matter) don’t want to launch a side hustle.
7. Real Estate Syndications
Syndications offer another way to invest in real estate for high potential returns. But unlike land investing or rental properties, syndications are largely passive investments.
They work like this: an experienced real estate investor goes out and finds a (hopefully) great deal that costs more than they can afford to buy on their own. So they bring in outside investors to partner with them on the deal, on exchange for a deal-finder fee or bonus.
The outside investors become partial owners of the property and share in its cash flow and profits upon sale. But we surrender most management decisions to the syndicator, the person who found and continues to oversee the deal.
We get to invest fractionally in a large real estate project, such as an apartment building, that we would never be able to buy individually. And an experienced real estate investor does all the work for us.
Of course, no investment is perfect. To begin with, most syndication deals only allow accredited investors to participate. The SEC makes the regulation too onerous to allow retail investors to partner on these deals. Along similar lines, syndications typically require a high minimum investment, often in the $50,000-$100,000 range.
And like any managed investment, you place your trust in the manager–in this case, the syndicator. You need to do your due diligence on both the property and the syndicator if you want peace of mind in your investments.
Many components of the capital rules that federal regulators proposed last month last month have elicited questions and concerns from in and around the banking sector, but none more than the treatment of single-family mortgages.
Trade groups representing banks and various parts of the mortgage industry have come out against the rules, as have housing affordability advocates. These groups say the impact of the proposed rule changes would be felt by the housing sector more so than the banks themselves.
“In the housing sector, which has just been in a sort of boxing ring getting punched, one after another, and getting exhausted from all that’s coming at them, this one is pretty incredible,” said David Stevens, a long-time mortgage executive who now heads Mountain Lake Consulting in Virginia. “We thought the current Basel rule made sense, but this one’s going to have downstream effects that are going to be very broad in the housing system.”
The change is expected to have at least a moderate impact on banks’ willingness to originate. While banks have been steadily ceding market share to independent mortgage banks and other nonbank lenders since the subprime mortgage crisis, they still play a key role in the so-called jumbo mortgage market, which consists of loans too large to be securitized and sold to the government sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
“The big, traditional mortgage lending banks have largely exited the field and that’s been going on for some time. This is the next nail in the coffin,” said Edward Pinto, director of the AEI Housing Center at the American Enterprise Institute. “This nail will make it harder for banks to compete with Fannie and Freddie, generally, and then take the one market they’ve had left to themselves, the jumbo market, and make it harder to originate because of the capital requirements.”
Some policy experts say the bigger impacts could come from the second-order effects of the regulation. In particular, they point to the treatment of mortgage servicing assets — the salable right to collect fees for providing day-to-day services to mortgages — as a change that could crimp the flow of credit throughout the housing finance sector and lead to higher costs being passed along to individual households.
“With potential borrowers already facing record high interest rates, steep home prices, and supply-chain issues, increased fees and scarcity of bank lenders could be another brick in the wall stopping Americans from obtaining meaningful homeownership and wealth creation,” said Andy Duane, a lawyer with mortgage-focused law firm Polunsky Beitel Green.
The proposal, put forth by the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Office of the Comptroller on the Currency, notes that the rule change could result in second-order effects on other banks, but it largely focuses on benefits that large banks could enjoy relative to smaller banks as a result of the new rules. It notes that such risks are offset by a requirement that banks adhere to both the new framework and the existing one, to ensure they do not see their regulatory capital levels dip below that of the standardized approach.
Still, the regulators are aware that the change could have unintended consequences on the mortgage industry and housing attainability. Because of this, their proposal includes several questions about the subject.
“We want to ensure that the proposal does not unduly affect mortgage lending, including mortgages to underserved borrowers,” Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr said while introducing the proposal in an open meeting last month. He added that housing affordability was one of “several areas that I will pay close attention to and encourage thoughtful comments.”
However, the proposal dismissed the idea that the new risk weights on residential mortgages would have a material impact on bank lending in that space. Citing various policy papers, academic studies and regulatory reports, the agencies assert that the risk-weight changes would lead banks adjusting their portfolios “only by a few percentage points.”
Stevens — who served as an assistant secretary in the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the Obama administration, a commissioner for the Federal Housing Administration and president of the Mortgage Bankers Association — said he is not convinced regulators have done sufficient analysis to rule out the type of sweeping, negative implications that he and others fear. He noted that the 1,087-page proposal includes fewer than 20 pages of economic analysis.
“I just don’t think they’ve thought through the downstream effects and the lack of analysis, in terms of actual financial estimates of the implications, is really concerning,” He said. “This will be a really big change, and that’s why you see everybody up in arms and the trade groups aligned against this proposal.”
Like other components of the bank regulators’ Basel III endgame proposal, the components related to mortgages would create standardized capital rules for large banks and do away with the ability for large institutions to use internal models. It also extends these requirements to all banks with more than $100 billion of assets, rather than only the largest, global systemically important banks.
The key provision in the package of proposed rules is the use of loan-to-value, or LTV, ratios to determine risk-weights for residential mortgage exposure.
The change could allow banks to hold less capital against lower LTV mortgages, though there is some skepticism about much of a reduction in capital that change will ultimately entail, especially for GSIBs that previously relied on internal models, said Pete Mills, senior vice president of residential policy for the Mortgage Bankers Association.
“Those risk weights aren’t published, so we don’t know what they are, but they are probably lower than 50% for low-LTV products,” Mills said.
The Basel Committee’s latest regulatory accord, which was finalized in December 2017, envisions LTV ratios as a means of assigning risk weights. But Mills said many in the mortgage banking space were caught off guard by how much further U.S. regulators went beyond their global counterparts. The joint proposal from the Fed, FDIC and OCC calls for a 20 percentage point increase across all LTV bands, meaning while mortgages with LTVs below 50% are assigned a 20% risk-weight under the Basel rule, the U.S. proposal calls for a 40% risk-weight. Similarly, where the Basel framework maxes out at a 70% risk-weight for mortgages with LTVs of 100% or more, the U.S. version has a top weight of 90%.
Under the current rules, most mortgages in the U.S. are assigned a 50% risk weight, so loans with LTVs between 61% and 80% would see their capital treatment stay the same, and any mortgages with LTVs of 60% or lower would see a lower capital requirement. Loans with an LTV of 80% or higher, meanwhile, would likely see a higher capital requirement.
“For GSIBs, that’s probably an increase in capital throughout the LTV rank,” Mills said. “For the rest, it’s a higher risk weight for higher-LTV mortgages and maybe slightly lower in other bands, but, in aggregate, that’s not good for the mortgage market. It’s a higher risk weighting for most mortgages.”
Approximately 25% of first-lien mortgages held by large banks began with an LTV of 80% or higher, according to data compiled by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Roughly 10% have an LTV of 90% or higher, while half were 70% or lower.
Mark Calabria, former head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said he is not surprised by the proposed treatment of mortgages, calling it a “natural evolution” of where regulators have been moving. He added that some elements of the proposal resemble changes he oversaw at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2020.
Calabria said mortgage risk is an issue in the financial system in need of regulatory reform, but he questions the methods being considered by bank regulators.
“I worry that they’re making the problem in the system worse by driving this risk off the balance sheets of depositories, which is probably actually where it should be in the first place,” he said. “I’m not opposed to them tinkering in this space they just need to be more holistic about it.”
The proposal also notes that the new treatment of residential mortgages is aimed at preventing large banks from having an unfair advantage over smaller competitors.
“Without the adjustment relative to Basel III risk weights in this proposal, marginal funding costs on residential real estate and retail credit exposures for many large banking organizations could have been substantially lower than for smaller organizations not subject to the proposal,” the document notes. “Though the larger organizations would have still been subject to higher overall capital requirements, the lower marginal funding costs could have created a competitive disadvantage for smaller firms.”
Yet, while regulators say the proposed rules promote a level playing field, some see it giving an unfair advantage to government-backed lenders.
Pinto sees the proposal as a continuation of a decades-long trend of federal regulators putting private lenders at a disadvantage to the governmental and quasi-governmental entities. He noted that if securities from Fannie and Freddie and loans backed by the FHA and Department of Veterans Affairs, which tend to have very high LTVs, are not given the same capital treatment as private-label mortgages, the net result will be the government playing an even larger role in the mortgage market that it already plays.
Pinto said despite these government programs targeting improved affordability, their provision of easy credit only drives up the cost of housing even further. He added that he hopes regulators reverse course on their treatment of mortgages in their final rule.
“They should just back off on this entirely. It’s inappropriate,” Pinto said. “They need to look at the overall impact they’re having on the mortgage market, and the housing and the finance market, and the role of the federal government, and the fact that the federal government is getting larger and larger in its role, which is inappropriate.”
The other concern is a lower cap on mortgage servicing assets that can be reflected in a bank’s regulatory capital. The proposal would see the cap changed from 25% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to 10%.
Mills said the capital charge for mortgage servicing rights is already “punitive” at a risk weight of 250%. By lowering the cap, he said, banks will be forced to hold an additional dollar of capital for every dollar of exposure beyond that cap. He noted that regulators had raised the cap to 25% five years ago for banks with between $100 billion and $250 billion of assets to provide some relief to large regional banks interested in that market.
If the cap is lowered, Mills said banks will be inclined to shed assets and shy away from mortgage servicing assets. Such moves would force pricing on servicing rights broadly, a trend that would ultimately lead to higher costs for borrowers.
“MSRs are going to be sold into a less liquid, less deep market, and there are consumer impacts here because MSR premiums are embedded in every mortgage note interest rate,” Mills said. “If MSR values are impacted by this significantly, that rolls downhill through the system. An opportunistic buyer might be able to buy rights at a depressed value, but that depressed value flows through to the consumer in the form of a higher interest rate.”
The proposal will be open to public comment through the end of November, after which regulators will review the input and incorporate elements of it into a final rule. Between the questions raised in the proposal, the acknowledgement by Fed and FDIC officials that the changes could hurt housing affordability, and the strong negative response to the proposal, there is optimism that the ultimate treatment of residential mortgages will be less impactful.
“Nobody seems to be pushing for this, and nobody other than the Fed seems to like it,” Calabria said. “If I was a betting man, it’s hard for me to believe that this is finalized the way it is now in terms of mortgages.”
Investing is a way to increase your wealth based on your risk tolerance and time horizon
The best investments for low-risk investors looking for moderate returns are index funds, government bonds, and high-yield savings accounts
The best investments for high-risk investors that want high returns are individual stocks, real estate, and cryptocurrencies
Investing is one of the best ways to grow your wealth and improve your financial future. One of the keys to finding the best investments is to recognize the power of compound interest. The credit bureau Experian® describes compound interest as “when interest gets added to the principal amount invested or borrowed, and then the interest rate applies to the new (larger) principal.”
There are many ways you can invest, and some investments earn more than others, and some investments are riskier than others. Today, you’re going to learn about the nine best investments in 2023 based on average returns as well as your personal risk tolerance.
The investing information provided is for educational purposes only. We recommend consulting a financial professional before investing.
The best investments
The best investments right now to grow your wealth include:
High-yield Savings Accounts
Short-term Certificates of Deposit (CDs)
Government Bonds
Corporate Bonds
Real Estate and REITs
Individual Stocks
Index Funds
Exchange-traded Funds (ETFs)
Cryptocurrency
1. High-yield Savings Accounts
High-yield savings accounts are similar to a regular savings account, but you’ll often earn more interest by keeping your money in one of these accounts. You can sign up for a high-yield savings account through many banks and credit unions, and some accounts can earn you anywhere from three to four percent annually.
If you have or plan on making an emergency fund, Javier Simon from SmartAsset recommends using one of these accounts. “Anyone looking to open a rainy day or emergency fund that provides a higher-than-average interest rate and high liquidity should consider a high-yield savings account,” writes Simon. You’re saving anyway, so why not make money from storing your funds?
Best investment for: People with lower risk tolerance and who are good at saving. This is one of the safest investments with high returns because many banks are FDIC insured, so even if the economy has a downturn, your money is backed by the government.
Risk level: Very low
How to invest: Banks, credit unions, and online banks
Potential returns: Moderate
2. Short-term Certificates of Deposit (CDs)
When looking for where to invest money, many people turn to certificates of deposit, which are also known as CDs. Like high-yield savings accounts, CDs are another type of account. CDs work by allowing you to deposit your money with the caveat that you don’t withdraw the money for a certain amount of time. Once that time frame expires, you’ll receive your money back as well as the interest.
Best investment for: People willing to store their money for one, three, or five years, which are the average predetermined time frames. Just remember, unlike a savings account, there’s a fee for withdrawing your money early.
Risk level: Very low
How to invest: Banks and credit unions
Potential returns: Moderate returns that sometimes exceed those of high-yield savings accounts
3. Government Bonds
Sometimes, the government needs to borrow money, so they offer people the option to loan them money via government bonds. Like CDs, these bonds are for a specified period, but they provide regular payments. Peoples sometimes use bonds as one of the best passive income investments due to these payments.
One caveat to note is the return on government bonds varies depending on how the economy is doing.
Best investment for: People with a low risk tolerance often buy government bonds. Unless the government fails, there’s not much that will prevent getting your return from this investment. Unlike other investments, government bonds can last for up to 30 years.
Risk level: Very low
How to invest: The United States Treasury or through a stock broker
Potential returns: Low
4. Corporate Bonds
Like government bonds, corporate bonds are loans, but you’re providing that loan to a company. This investment helps companies that need money to invest in new products and expand their business. Since these aren’t backed by the government, they can be riskier because the company may go out of business. Although these have a higher risk, they also have a higher return than government bonds.
Best investment for: Individuals with a higher risk tolerance and are looking for higher returns may want to invest in corporate bonds. These bonds pay out regularly, and they’re a safer investment when buying bonds from large, stable companies that have been around for a while.
Risk level: Moderate to high
How to invest: Stock brokerages
Potential returns: High
5. Real Estate and REITs
One of the investment ideas many people turn to is real estate because it can provide extremely high returns when the housing market is good. The downside is that when the housing market has a downturn, as we saw in 2008, people experience big losses.
Rather than investing in real estate, you can invest in real estate stocks, which are called real estate investment trusts (REITs). These stocks are for companies that own properties like malls, office buildings, and other forms of real estate that generate revenue. These can be slightly less risky but still have some risk due to the nature of real estate.
Best investment for: Those who are looking for high returns or have a diversified portfolio already and can weather some higher-risk investments.
Risk level: High
How to invest: Mortgage broker for real estate and stock brokerages for REITs
Potential returns: High
6. Individual Stocks
Individual stocks are available to everyone, and when the average person buys these types of stocks, they’re known as “retail investors.” You may have heard of retail investors investing in individual stocks during the GameStop stock hype of 2021, which also showed how risky individual stocks can be.
Individual stocks come with a high risk and high reward. Basically, you’re buying a portion of a single company, also known as a share of the company. Numerous factors dictate the price of a stock including the profits or losses of the company as well as speculation of the future of the company.
Best investment for: People who are looking for higher returns and don’t mind the risk may want to invest in individual stocks. These stocks can involve doing a lot of research into a company in order to make a quality decision. It’s possible for single stocks have the potential for large returns and losses. For example, investing in Amazon (AMZN) in 2018 and selling in 2021 would have over a 100 percent return, but buying in 2021 and selling in 2022 would have a 50 percent loss.
Risk level: High
How to invest: Stock brokerage
Potential returns: Low to high
7. Index Funds
Index funds are a type of stock, but rather than owning one stock, you’ll own multiple stocks. These stocks track a specific market, like the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones. When purchasing an index fund, there are often low fees and steady returns. The famous investor and founder of The Vanguard Group, John C. Bogel, popularized investing in index funds. This type of investing is popular because indexes like S&P 500 index funds track the 500 largest companies in the United States.
Best investment for: People who are new to investing as you don’t need to regularly check in and research different companies because index funds track the top companies in the U.S.
Risk level: Low
How to invest: Stock brokerage companies
Potential returns: Moderate
8. Exchange-traded Funds (ETFs)
Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are similar to index funds because your single stock has shares of multiple companies, but ETFs are usually for specific industries or categories. For example, ARK Invest is a well-known ETF that often invests in technology companies, and there are other ETFs that have an assortment of bonds, like Vanguard’s Bond Market Index Fund (BND).
Best investment for: People with a moderate level of risk tolerance. ETFs can be thought of as a mix between index funds and individual stocks since they’re riskier than index funds, but they’re less risky than individual stocks because you’re more diversified.
Risk level: Moderate
How to invest: Stock brokerage
Potential returns: Low to high
9. Alternative Investments
Cryptocurrency trading is a hot topic, but many people don’t fully understand how it works. Cryptocurrencies are a digital form of currency that’s traded on a network known as the blockchain. The first cryptocurrency was Bitcoin, and now, there’s an endless number of cryptocurrencies. Many people have become millionaires or billionaires from investing in crypto, but it’s an extremely volatile market, and many more have also lost their life savings.
Currently, there is very little to no regulation around cryptocurrency, and much of the investing involves speculation. Notable investors like Warren Buffett and his business partner Charlie Munger have been highly critical of crypto investing, calling it, “worthless, artificial gold.”
Best investment for: People with a high risk tolerance and can tolerate losing their investment may find high returns with crypto investing.
Risk level: Very high
How to invest: Crypto exchanges
Potential returns: Very high
How to Choose the Best Investments
There’s no single right way to choose the best investments because it’s dependent on your unique situation. To make the best choice for yourself, you’ll need to assess your personal risk tolerance and when you’re hoping to cash out on your investments.
1. Assess Your Risk Tolerance
When it comes to investing, the higher the risk, the higher the reward, but it can also mean bigger losses due to unforeseen circumstances. While looking at the top nine best investments, consider how risky they are and whether or not they’re right for you. If you’re concerned about losing money and simply want steady, average returns from your investments, you may want to choose investments that are lower risk.
2. Gauge Your Time Horizon
An important aspect of investing is when you plan on needing the returns from your investment. Many people invest as a way to save for retirement, but some people invest in order to make money to pursue another goal, like purchasing a new home or going on a big trip. For those with a longer time frame of 10 or more years, you can tolerate making low-risk investments with steady returns. If you need the returns sooner, you may want to look into taking more risks.
A simple way to invest based on your time horizon is to use target date funds. The United States Securities and Exchange Commission describes target date funds as being “designed to be long-term investments for individuals with particular retirement dates in mind.” With this type of fund, you set the date you plan on retiring or selling your investments, and it will automatically adjust for risk.
3. Recognize Your Personal Investment Knowledge
Investing does come along with some risks, and these risks vary depending on which type of investing you do. For example, investing in a high-yield savings account is much less of a risk than investing in individual stocks. As a way to minimize your risk and be fully aware of the risks you’re taking, it’s helpful to educate yourself further on each investment and gauge your personal knowledge.
There’s always room to grow your investing and personal finance knowledge. Even the greatest investors in the world continue to learn as much as they can about investment strategies.
4. Assess How Much You Can Budget for Investing
When getting started on your investment journey, it’s often a good idea to minimize your debts as much as possible before creating a budget. For example, if you have a high amount of credit card debt, the interest you’re paying will counteract the money you’re putting into different investment opportunities.
Once you have minimal debt, you can create a budget to see how much you can invest each month. With many of the investments covered here, you can set up automatic investments to make the process a little easier as well.
Best Investments: FAQ
Now, you know about various investments as well as the risk associated with each one. The following are some additional frequently asked questions to help you get started with investing.
What Is Compound Interest?
Compound interest is when the money you make from interest starts making you additional money as well. For example, with a 10 percent interest rate, $1,000 would make you $100. The following year, you’d earn 10 percent interest on $1,100 because that extra $100 you earned will earn interest as well.
Without investing anything else, your original $1,000 investment will be more than double your original investment in 10 years.
Which Investment Gives the Highest Returns?
Investments that have the highest return opportunities include real estate, individual stocks, and alternative investments like cryptocurrencies. Just be sure to keep in mind that these investments also come with the most risk.
Is It OK to Invest During Times of Uncertainty?
Investing during uncertain times can bring better-than-average returns later on. Marcus by Goldman Sachs recommends taking the long view when making your investments. Even during a bad economy, historical data shows that it eventually recovers. You’ll just need to assess your risk and decide if you can weather the storm until it rebounds.
Should You Invest with Bad Credit?
Investing is a way to save for your retirement or future purchases, and it can increase your overall net worth. If you have bad credit or a lot of debt, it may be best to wait on investing because that money could go to paying off debt, improving your credit, and increasing your financial security.
If you need help improving or repairing your credit score, allow Credit.com to help. We have services like ExtraCredit, and we can also provide you with a free credit report card. We’ll be there to help you learn how to improve your credit as well as other ways to increase your wealth, so sign up today!
[Editor’s note: This is an excerpt from the conclusions from the category product review series for the small landlord property management software sector. It answers two of the questions posed in the introduction. Originally published in the Geek Estate Mastermind.]
Are backend landlord tools and front-end rental search products in conflict with each other?
These two will continue converging into one another. Zumper and Zillow are starting from the search side, while Avail and Cozy are on the flip side. Airbnb is a different animal altogether. There are areas where goals conflict. For instance, first in and banned evictions are both loved by tenants but hated by landlords. That said, those are both regulation issues. One area where they align is that tenants want to search a comprehensive supply and landlords want to reach the largest possible renter audience (as long as they are qualified).
Will Cozy and Avail end up adding a search experience or syndicating to more partners?
I believe both will continue to focus on syndication, particularly Avail because it does not have the benefit of a large audience on its own (Zumper, Zillow, and Cozy all have access to leverage). Given Cozy operates inside the confines of CoStar, it is far more likely to be built out as a benefit to the company’s customers already using its broad search assets (especially following the acquisition of RentPath), rather than trying to win a syndication battle.
To be sure, there was a bit of a learning curve initially. But he credits Solis and Eric Tan, the producing branch manager at VA Wholesale Mortgage, with supporting him along the way. Tan had opened the shop the previous February, Anderson noted. “It boiled down to the support system I had,” Anderson said of … [Read more…]
A checking account can be the foundation of your financial life, allowing you to receive money, spend it, and manage other day-to-day transactions. A high-yield checking account can offer you all that, plus an enhanced interest rate vs. other similar accounts. Typically, money in a checking account doesn’t earn any interest — or maybe a nominal fraction of a percent.
The idea of earning interest may be enticing: A high-yield checking account can turn your regular deposit account into a passive income machine. While it’s unlikely to make you rich, a high-yield checking account can help pad your pockets with a few extra interest dollars, which can add up over time.
However, these accounts can come with certain conditions that may or may not make them the right choice for you.
Here’s what you need to know.
High-Yield Checking Accounts Explained
High-yield checking accounts, as their name implies, are checking accounts that offer a high “yield,” or interest rate, on the balance held in the account.
Whereas the national average for an interest-bearing checking account is about 0.07% APY (annual percentage yield) per the FDIC, a high-yield account might offer 1% to 4% APY or even higher — which still might not make you a fortune, but is a significant upgrade and on a par with some savings accounts.
High-yield checking accounts make it possible to create a passive income stream, albeit a small one, just by holding money in your checking account (which you likely already do). In this way, a high-yield checking account can augment interest earnings — be they from investments like high-yield bonds or other types of banking products, like a high-interest savings account.
But if you’re wondering if there’s a catch, the answer may be yes. 💡 Quick Tip: Tired of paying pointless bank fees? When you open a bank account online you often avoid excess charges.
Does a High-Yield Checking Account Come With Fees?
You’ve probably heard there’s no such thing as a free lunch, and when it comes to high-yield checking accounts, that adage holds true — although it might not necessarily cost you cash out of your pocket.
Although some high-yield checking accounts come with monthly maintenance fees that could easily eclipse whatever interest you stand to earn, these fees can commonly be waived so long as you maintain a certain minimum monthly balance or meet other requirements. These may include making a certain number of debit card transactions or receiving a certain threshold in direct-deposit income each month.
These days, there are even some free high-yield checking accounts — usually offered through online banks — but the level of interest you’ll earn depends on your ability to meet the same kind of transaction minimums we just mentioned. (If you don’t meet the requirements, you might not earn any interest at all.)
So, in short, while you might not have to pay for your high-yield checking account, you’ll likely need to perform the basic minimum monthly transaction requirements in order to glean the full benefits of the account.
Ready for a Better Banking Experience?
Open a SoFi Checking and Savings Account and start earning up to 4.50% APY on your cash!
Top 3 Pros of a High-Yield Checking Account
High-yield checking accounts can be very beneficial — here’s how.
1. More Earnings
These accounts offer an opportunity for interest earnings simply by holding a checking account. In some cases, the interest rate may rival that of certain kinds of savings accounts.
2. Motivation to Keep More in Your Account
These high-yield checking accounts can incentivize account holders to keep a higher minimum balance due to interest-earning requirements — which can help you generate a cash cushion.
3. Availability
These accounts are becoming increasingly available, especially thanks to the proliferation of online-only banks. 💡 Quick Tip: Want a new checking account that offers more access to your money? With 55,000+ ATMs in the Allpoint network, you can get cash when and where you choose.
Cons of a High-Yield Checking Account
On the other side of the coin (pun totally intended), high-yield checking accounts can have their drawbacks.
Transaction Requirements
These high-yield accounts may come with transaction requirements to secure interest earnings. If the account holder doesn’t meet them, little or no interest will be earned. These obligations might suit your money style, or they might prove to be a major hassle.
Modest Interest (If We’re Honest)
Many interest-bearing accounts generate just a fraction of a percentage in interest. Even the highest-yield checking accounts only offer about 4.00% APY. Yes, every little bit helps but this certainly isn’t enough money to grow wealthy on.
Additional Fees
In some cases, high-yield checking accounts may come with fees. Waiving them may require holding a significant minimum monthly balance — which can be challenging for individuals and families living paycheck to paycheck.
Let’s review the pros and cons again in a table:
Pros of High-Yield Checking Accounts
Cons of High-Yield Checking Accounts
Potential to earn interest on checking, which normally offers little or no earning potential
May have many monthly transaction minimums to meet in order to qualify for interest earnings
Can incentivize account holders to keep more money in their accounts
May have fees that can only be waived by maintaining a significant minimum monthly balance or meeting minimum transaction requirements
Are increasingly available — and increasingly fee-free — from online banks
Even the best high-yield checking accounts typically offer far less than the average return on stocks and bonds (though when FDIC-insured, these checking accounts can be a safer investment vehicle)
Recommended: What Is a Certificate of Deposit (CD)?
High-Yield Checking Accounts vs High-Yield Savings Accounts
If you are comparing high-interest checking and high-yield savings accounts, you will likely want to consider the following points:
• A high-interest checking account does generate money on your deposit, but may come with minimum transaction or balance requirements. These could be difficult for some people to meet.
• A high-interest savings account can offer good earning power, but the number of transactions you are allowed could be limited. Although Regulation D, which limits savings accounts to six transactions a month, was largely suspended since the COVID-19 pandemic, some financial institutions may still apply this rule and charge fees if you conduct more transfers.
Depending on your needs, one of these may be a better option than the other. Also, it is likely to be easier to find a solid interest rate with a high-yield savings account than with the checking variety. In other words, many high-interest checking accounts don’t offer all that much earning power.
Factors to Look For in a High-Yield Checking Account
If you’re shopping for a high-yield checking account, consider these factors:
Interest Rate
Of course, you will likely want to shop around and see what are the highest rates available for a checking account. While some high-yield accounts are currently offering a few points of interest, many just pay a fraction of a percent.
Minimum Balance
With this kind of checking account, you may be required to make a specific size of deposit to open the account. You may also need to keep a certain balance in order to earn the high interest rate or to avoid fees. If that’s the case, make sure you can meet that number.
Fees
In addition, when opening a checking account, be sure you understand what fees might be charged. These can include maintenance, overdraft, ATM, and foreign transaction fees, among others. You’ll probably want to avoid being charged fees so that they don’t eat away at the interest you are earning. Online banks may be more likely to waive such fees.
How to Qualify for High-Yield Checking Accounts
In order to qualify for a high-yield checking account — and actually get the benefits — you’ll need to be able to fulfill whatever that account specifies as far as transaction requirements or minimum opening deposits.
In addition, if your banking history is marked by overdrafts and other negative factors, this may be reported by ChexSystems, which is kind of like a credit score for banking. If you have many negative factors, you may not be able to qualify for a high-yield checking account — or other types of deposit accounts, either. (If your ChexSystems report contains errors, you can always dispute false information with ChexSystems online.) 💡 Quick Tip: When you overdraft your checking account, you’ll likely pay a non-sufficient fund fee of, say, $35. Look into linking a savings account to your checking account as a backup to avoid that, or shop around for a bank that doesn’t charge you for overdrafting.
How to Open a High-Yield Checking Account
Now that you know what a high-yield checking account is, you may wonder how to open one. The process is similar to opening any other type of account. You’ll be asked to provide:
• Personal information, such as your name and address
• Proof of address (such as a utility bill)
• Government-issued photo ID
• Your Social Security number or other taxpayer identification number
In addition, your chosen bank may also require a certain minimum opening deposit, which you’ll need to provide to activate the account. The bank will offer specific details as far as what documentation is required and how to deliver it.
Opening a Checking and Savings Account With SoFi
A high-yield checking account is a great way to augment whatever passive income you might earn from savings accounts, investments, and other holdings. Although the interest rates are usually relatively low, they’re a lot better than 0% — every little bit of interest earned counts!
Interested in opening an online bank account? When you sign up for a SoFi Checking and Savings account with direct deposit, you’ll get a competitive annual percentage yield (APY), pay zero account fees, and enjoy an array of rewards, such as access to the Allpoint Network of 55,000+ fee-free ATMs globally. Qualifying accounts can even access their paycheck up to two days early.
Better banking is here with up to 4.50% APY on SoFi Checking and Savings.
3 Great Benefits of Direct Deposit
It’s Faster
As opposed to a physical check that can take time to clear, you don’t have to wait days to access a direct deposit. Usually, you can use the money the day it is sent. What’s more, you don’t have to remember to go to the bank or use your app to deposit your check.
It’s Like Clockwork
Whether your check comes the first Wednesday of the month or every other Friday, if you sign up for direct deposit, you know when the money will hit your account. This is especially helpful for scheduling the payment of regular bills. No more guessing when you’ll have sufficient funds.
It’s Secure
While checks can get lost in the mail — or even stolen, there is no chance of that happening with a direct deposit. Also, if it’s your paycheck, you won’t have to worry about your or your employer’s info ending up in the wrong hands.
FAQ
Is a high-yield checking account worth it?
This all depends on whether or not you can meet the minimum monthly transaction requirements. If you can fairly easily do so, a high-yield checking account is an easy way to earn passive income just by keeping an active bank account. But if you can’t, you might not earn any interest at all — or even pay additional fees for the account.
Is there a risk with high-yield checking accounts?
You may risk paying a monthly maintenance fee and other charges if you can’t meet the minimum requirements needed to waive them.
How do I open a high-yield checking account?
Opening a high-yield checking account is much like opening any other type of bank account. You’ll be asked for various documentation (such as government-issued photo ID and your Social Security or Taxpayer ID number) in order to verify your identity and residence. In addition, you may also need to make a certain minimum opening deposit.
What is the difference between a high-yield checking and savings account?
A high-yield checking account is designed to be the hub of your financial life and typically doesn’t have any limits on the number of transactions you may make; savings accounts may restrict this. However, this kind of checking account likely pays less interest than a high-yield savings account, which may do a better job of helping you generate passive income.
Can you withdraw money from a high-yield savings account?
Yes, you can withdraw money from a high-yield savings account. However, there may be restrictions on how many transactions you can make per month. Going over that number could result in fees or the account being converted to a checking account.
The SoFi Bank Debit Mastercard® is issued by SoFi Bank, N.A., pursuant to license by Mastercard International Incorporated and can be used everywhere Mastercard is accepted. Mastercard is a registered trademark, and the circles design is a trademark of Mastercard International Incorporated.
SoFi members with direct deposit can earn up to 4.50% annual percentage yield (APY) on savings balances (including Vaults) and 0.50% APY on checking balances. There is no minimum direct deposit amount required to qualify for the 4.50% APY for savings. Members without direct deposit will earn up to 1.20% annual percentage yield (APY) on savings balances (including Vaults) and 0.50% APY on checking balances. Interest rates are variable and subject to change at any time. These rates are current as of 8/2/2023. There is no minimum balance requirement. Additional information can be found at http://www.sofi.com/legal/banking-rate-sheet.
Financial Tips & Strategies: The tips provided on this website are of a general nature and do not take into account your specific objectives, financial situation, and needs. You should always consider their appropriateness given your own circumstances.
Third-Party Brand Mentions: No brands, products, or companies mentioned are affiliated with SoFi, nor do they endorse or sponsor this article. Third-party trademarks referenced herein are property of their respective owners.